On Nov 23, 2011, at 7:59 AM, Christian Schmitz wrote: > > Am 22.11.2011 um 17:30 schrieb Michael Diehr: > >> * does not require tons of memory > > I'll reduce the Scaling method memory need. > > For some reason we used doubles there and now I simply use UInt8 which > reduces memory requirements by more than 80%.
That would help, thank you. Would it be possible to make the yield ticks value into a yieldMilliseconds value instead? Or, to be more backwards compatible, how about the yieldTicks value could be a double? Internally, I wonder if there is any overhad difference between calling Ticks() vs. Microseconds() a lot? Also - the MT - multithreaded version -- does it always use the current CPU thread? It would be interesting to have a MT version which only used the other CPUs, leaving the current thread's CPU idle (to give time to the rest of the foreground threads). _______________________________________________ Mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info mailing list [email protected] https://ml01.ispgateway.de/mailman/listinfo/mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info
