At 10:26 AM 2/12/2016, you wrote: >>I'm only asking this as sort of a test for myself, because I always want to >>provide an up-to-date-as-possible PPC/10.4/5 version of my apps to my >>customers. Right now I just provide one binary (written in 2011r3). This year >>I'll start providing more binaries, but it'll be later this year. The goal >>for me is to keep the PPC/10.4/5 as effective as possible, even though it'll >>be using an older version of your plugs.
>Well, I could of course compile a 16.1 as PPC for 10.4 or 10.5 as target. >But that is some work and I'd like to hear a good reason for that. The above is all the reason I got =) but of course I can simply do the right input on that PortAudio thing. I was just communicating that the desire to keep PPC/10.4/5 apps current is important to me/some. I won't mind once I get multiple binaries out the door, but it'll be a shame if I have to "choose" beforehand. In my industry people still use "old" stuff because it still works. And isn't that the only reason we use computers? =) Don't worry about it, I was just testing that water. I appreciate your consideration on it. Garth Hjelte Sampler User _______________________________________________ Mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info mailing list [email protected] https://ml01.ispgateway.de/mailman/listinfo/mbsplugins_monkeybreadsoftware.info
