MbUnit Re: Asserts

Wed, 26 Jul 2006 03:15:34 -0700

Hi,
 
In addtion I noticed the following about the NUnit 2.4 new collection assert and the MbUnit 2.3 rc1 Assert
 
AreCountEqual
AreElementsEqual - NUnit AllItemsAreNotNull and AllItemsAreInstancesOf would be closest
AreEqual - NUnit
AreIsSyncronisedEqual
AreSyncRootEqual
Equals - NUnit AllItemsAreInstancesOf, Contains, DoesNotContain would be closest
IsCountCorrect
IsNotyncronised (actully a typo should be IsNotSyncronised)
IsSyncronised
ReferanceEquals

The following NUnit collection asserts are not supported directly

AllItemsAreInstancesof, AllItemsAreUnique, AreNotEqual, AreEquivalent,

AreNotEquivalent, Contains, DoesNotContain, IsSubSetOf and IsNotSubSetOf.

Again we may have cross over but I am looking for feedback as to what folks need and what they would like to cherry pick from this.
 
Andy
 
On 7/26/06, Andrew Stopford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
 
While writing up a blog post on MbUnit asserts I noticed the following that NUnit has compared to MbUnit.
  • AreNotEqual
  • IsEmpty
  • IsNotEmpty

Type Asserts

  • IsNaN
  • IsInstanceofType
  • IsNotInstanceOfType
  • IsAssignableFrom
  • IsNotAssignableFrom
We do have a lot of asserts on them as well :) and we may have some cross over (point it out if thats the case) but it's struck me that we may have some missing functionality so I would like to know if these are of value to you in your testing toolbox and if you want them added?
 
Andy

 

 

 



--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MbUnit.User" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/MbUnitUser
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to