Thank you verry much everybody,

Your answers were real helpfull.

Thx

On Apr 18, 8:28 pm, "Jonathan de Halleux"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MbUnit is extendible by design. If a feature is missing, you can add it
> without recompiling MbUnit (and without asking for permission).
>
> On 4/18/07, Andrew Stopford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > MSTest, NUnit, ZaneBug and MbUnit all work with TestDriven.net which is
> > the very best way of running unit tests in VS. csUnit and MSTest have there
> > own test runners for VS, MSTest does have support for its own runner and the
> > td.net runner.
>
> > Andy
>
> > On 4/18/07, Andrew Stopford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > btw If anyone has any corrections or additions then please do email them
> > > on.
>
> > > Andy
>
> > >  On 4/18/07, Andrew Stopford <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> > > > Hi,
>
> > > > I'll try and present an honest and level arguement for you. Choosing a
> > > > framework really depends on your what your testing requirements are for 
> > > > now
> > > > and the future. Some of the features I wil mention below will need you 
> > > > to
> > > > research further but hopefully you can match your requirements against 
> > > > the
> > > > features.
>
> > > > All 3 frameworks (as well csUnit and ZaneBug) have the same set of
> > > > basic asserts and fixtures.
> > > > All 3 frameworks work with TestDriven.net which is the very best way
> > > > of running unit tests in VS.
> > > > MSTest is bound until VS Orcas to the VSTS additions of VS, when Orcas
> > > > ships it will be available in the pro sku additions of VS. csUnit,
> > > > ZaneBug, MbUnit and NUnit all work on all sku additions of VS2003 and
> > > > VS2005.
> > > > MbUnit and NUnit both have collection and array asserts (ZaneBug and
> > > > MSTest may have collection asserts, can someone confirm that?).
> > > > MbUnit and NUnit have fixtures for setting the running order, excludes
> > > > and includes (I think ZaneBug has something like this too, Sean ?? :))
> > > > MbUnit has a greatest degree of asserts of all frameworks including
> > > > asserrts for perf, reflection, compiler and others.
> > > > MbUnit and MSTest have the ability to test private methods, MbUnit has
> > > > a richer support for this.
> > > > MbUnit and MSTest have the ability data drive unit tests, MSTest can
> > > > do this from a database or XML file, MbUnit is currantly XML file only.
> > > > MbUnit is the only framework to support row testing and pair wise
> > > > testing (row testing is on the ZaneBug road map).
> > > > ZaneBug has the richest support of all frameworks for performance
> > > > indicators and testing.
> > > > NUnit is the only framework to support constraints.
> > > > NUnit is the only framework to run on Mono (on the MbUnit and ZaneBug
> > > > roadmaps).
> > > > NUnit as the oldest framework has the greatest degree of articles
> > > > (MbUnit as a much younger project is building this up with every passing
> > > > month), books and the biggest adoption within test and CI tools (however
> > > > NUnit and MbUnit are supported natively with the mostly widely used CI
> > > > server, CCNet).
>
> > > > I hope that helps.
>
> > > > Andy
>
> > > >  On 4/18/07, Mahes <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
>
> > > > > I'm rather new to unit testing.
>
> > > > > And I have to choose a testing platform now.
>
> > > > > Anybody who can tell me what MBUnit can do that NUnit or
> > > > > mstest(Visual
> > > > > Studio for Software testers) can't do?
> > > > > I don't want answers like:  It's great, It's the best..   but I'm
> > > > > looking for the differences on wich I can base my choice.
>
> > > > > TIA
>
> --
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"MbUnit.User" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/MbUnitUser?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to