Sorry for the confusion. I never liked the division of labor between MbUnit.Framework and MbUnit.Framework.2.0 either.
You will be pleased to know that for MbUnit v3, we will be distributing multple versions of the same assemblies compiled using different .Net frameworks. So you'll be able to download and install either a .Net 2.0 or a .Net 3.5 build of MbUnit. I have no immediate plans to do the same thing with the MbUnit v2 line but it could happen in a v2.5 release. Jeff. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel (Jaykul) Bennett Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 8:54 AM To: MbUnit.User Subject: MbUnit MbUnit.Framework.2.0 is confusing to new (and old) users. I've been using MbUnit for a while now ... but I just had to start on a clean dev PC, and when I went to create a new .Net Framework 3.5 project using MbUnit ... I added a reference to MbUnit.Framework.2.0 without really thinking about it very much -- clearly the other "MbUnit.Framework" is in .Net 1.1x so this must be the right one (I thought). Anyway. An hour and a half later, I finally figured out that my problem is that I need a reference to both of them in order to actually be able to do testing *and* still use .Net2 version of the Rollback attribute... Maybe I'm just stupid ... or maybe that dll ought to be renamed as MbUnitExtensionsFor2.0 or something... -- Joel "Jaykul" Bennett http://HuddledMasses.org/ qotd: If you only have a hammer, you tend to see every problem as a nail. -- Maslow --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MbUnit.User" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/MbUnitUser?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
