You don't need to have .Net 1.1 installed for MbUnit v2 to run. The error you're getting is weird but it indicates one of two things: - QuickGraph.Algorithms can't be found next to the MbUnit.GUI.exe or is missing altogether. - Or there are mismatched versions floating around.
In any case, I downloaded the ZIP file for that version and tried it out. Seems to work. I've seen these problems before and they can be quite pernicious. For example, sometimes it will happen that Visual Studio will hold onto an old assembly reference even though a newer version is available. This can happen when it thinks it needs a specific version of the assembly for some reason. Keep in mind that your tests need to be compiled with the exact same version of MbUnit as the test runner itself. Jeff. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Borek Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:43 AM To: MbUnit.User Subject: MbUnit Re: How to build? Is there a ZIP distribution? Is .NET 1.1 required just to build MbUnit or even to run the GUI runner? I am constantly getting this error: System.Application.Exception: Failed Reloading domain ---> ... ---> FileNotFoundException: Could not load file or assembly 'QuickGraph.Algorithms, Version=2.21.1.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=975e84d0c8d6464d' or one of its dependencies. The system cannot find the file specified. This happened with multiple MbUnit revision, most recently with 2.4.2.243. I tried it on my development machine where I installed and uninstalled MbUnit many times so I though there might be something messed up but I got exactly the same error inside a clean VM. I'm really not sure what am I doing wrong - MbUnit is so widely used that I guess some mistake must be on my part. Why is it trying to load the wrong quickgraph assembly version? Borek On Jul 9, 10:59 pm, "Jeff Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's because we still have .Net 1.1 users of MbUnit v2. > > In MbUnit v3 we are breaking backwards compatibility in a few areas, > including dropping support for .Net 1.1. So MbUnit v3 requires .Net > 2.0+ now. > > Jeff. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On > > Behalf Of Borek > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 1:37 PM > To: MbUnit.User > Subject: MbUnit Re: How to build? Is there a ZIP distribution? > > Thanks Jeff, wouldn't it be a good idea to put that link somewhere on > the MbUnit website? ZIP distribution can be really useful sometimes. > > As for .NET 1.1, is it just a MbUnit v2 thing or is this "limitation" > still present for v3? > > Regards, > Borek > > On Jul 9, 9:58 pm, "Jeff Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > .Net 1.1 is required to build MbUnit v2 because it is still mostly > > compiled for .Net 1.1. Nothing we can really do about that unless > > we start distributing two versions of MbUnit v2. > > > In any case, you'll find a ZIP file distribution > > here:http://ccnet.gallio.org/Distributables/ > > > Jeff. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On > > > Behalf Of Borek > > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 7:32 AM > > To: MbUnit.User > > Subject: MbUnit How to build? Is there a ZIP distribution? > > > Hi all, > > > I am trying to start with MbUnit but am having quite a few problems > > so > far. > > > First of all, isn't there a ZIP distribution somewhere? I'm not sure > > why I need to go through the installation procedure (adding VS > > templates etc.) if all I need is to drop a DLL somewhere. BTW, GUI > > runner was not working for me with the 2.4.2.130 version - the > > Exception dialog was telling me that the QuickGraph.Algorithms > > assembly was not found (version mismatch again?; physically, the DLL > > was > there). > > > So I thought I would get the source from SVN and build MbUnit myself. > > I found no README so I though I would be good to just execute > > Build.bat or Release.bat but it didn't work for me. It was telling > > me that .NET 1.1 was not found (which is right, it's not 2003 on my > > machine any more). Am I doing something wrong or is .NET 1.1 really > required? > > > Thanks, > > Borek --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MbUnit.User" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/MbUnitUser?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
