Well... I think I'll go with v3 then :) I'll have a look at it :) Is everything available from http://www.gallio.org/ ? Thank you Simo
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Jeff Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But in v3 all you need to do is subclass DataSourceAttribute and override > one method. > In v2 it's possible but a lot harder. > > Jeff. > > ------------------------------ > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On > Behalf Of *Simone Chiaretta > *Sent:* Friday, September 12, 2008 9:57 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* MbUnit Re: RowTesting based on a folder > > Obviously the question was: now that I know it's possible, what can I do > to make it happen? :) > Didn't find anything on the doc site about creating new test types. > Probably since v3 is still in alpha, I'd better use v2. :) > Simo > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Simone Chiaretta < > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I always used v2, but since it's a new project I could also start with v3. >> Simo >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:09 PM, Jeff Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >> >>> It's possible. >>> Are you using MbUnit v2 or v3? >>> >>> Jeff. >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> *On Behalf Of *Simone Chiaretta >>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 11, 2008 8:25 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* MbUnit RowTesting based on a folder >>> >>> Don't know if this is possible, but I'd like to know it it's possible >>> to use an external source as source for the rowtests. >>> Let me explain my scenario to make the question clearer: >>> >>> My library has only one method, that does tons of things, but basically >>> it's a parser that takes in a language, and convert it to an output. >>> My tests are basically one line of code that read the contents of a file >>> with the statements, pass the string to the library, gets the output, and >>> compare it to the text which is stored in another file. >>> >>> Now I'm doing it using rowtest that takes in the statement file and the >>> expected result file and everything works fine. >>> But what I'd like to do is give to the test only the folder where all >>> these files are, and have it process automatically all of them. >>> >>> I could do a master test that read the folder and calls the single test >>> one time per file, but then I'd loose the independence of all the tests >>> since the test will fail if just one fails, and this is not good. >>> >>> Is it possible to do this? >>> Simo >>> >>> -- >>> Simone Chiaretta >>> codeclimber.net.nz >>> Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic >>> "Life is short, play hard" >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Simone Chiaretta >> codeclimber.net.nz >> Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic >> "Life is short, play hard" >> > > > > -- > Simone Chiaretta > codeclimber.net.nz > Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic > "Life is short, play hard" > > > -- Simone Chiaretta codeclimber.net.nz Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic "Life is short, play hard" --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "MbUnit.User" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/MbUnitUser?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
