Jeff Brown wrote:
It's not in there yet but it's planned (read: half-implemented).
You can try [CsvData] for now.  Actually I find the *.csv files easier to maintain than Xml for flat data since there's no need to muck about with XPath selectors to map data back to rows and columns.

Just the same, I'll try to push out [XmlData] for v3.0.6.

Jeff.


Hi Again!

Actually, I think there is a lot to be said for this too.  After having poked around a bit more I started to think that CSV woud be easier for the very reason you describe.

One thing about these odd test results I recived.

In my test file I have an int field that in Excel (where I'm making the CSV test data) that is either blank or has an int value.  I first tried setting the test signature parameter to int? to see if this aided the running of the tests but it still really didn't like an empty field being passed in, the strings were fine however.

I'm also glad that its not in there (xml) as I thought I was going mad looking for it.

I'm not sure what your thoughts are on this but it would be really nice not having to embed the data file in the test dll.  Is this doable?

Reply via email to