Yes, if I use a static factory it works!
This implementation works perfectly for report generation but when I
load the assembly with a runner, eg Icarus,
this is what I get in the Test Explorer :
Fixture
- Test1
- Test2
Do you think that its possible the get the following in the Test
Explorer without any custom attributes?
Fixture({Mike})
- Test1
- Test2
Fixture({Jim})
- Test1
- Test2
Thanx
On Jan 23, 1:24 pm, Jeff Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes the latter using a static factory method.
>
> Is it not working?
>
> Jeff.
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:26 AM, max2256 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Sorry again, is this what you mean?
>
> > public class Fixture
> > {
> > private Person person;
>
> > public Fixture( [Factory("CreatePersons")] Person p)
> > {
> > person = p;
> > }
>
> > public static IEnumerable<Person> CreatePersons()
> > {
> > yield return new Person("Mike");
> > yield return new Person("Jim");
> > }
>
> > [Test]
> > public void Test1()
> > {
> > // do something with person
> > }
>
> > [Test]
> > public void Test2()
> > {
> > // do something with person
> > }
>
> > }
>
> > On Jan 23, 11:42 am, max2256 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Ok, this is exactly what I need to do, but not sure on how to
> > > implement this.
>
> > > eg:
>
> > > public class Fixture
> > > {
>
> > > [Factory("CreatePersons")]
> > > public Fixture(Person p)
> > > {
> > > // how do I add the steps to the fixture
> > > // how do I pass the Person p parameter to Test1 and Test2
> > > }
>
> > > public IEnumerable<Person> CreatePersons()
> > > {
> > > yield return new Person("Mike");
> > > yield return new Person("Jim");
> > > }
>
> > > [Test]
> > > public void Test1(Person p)
> > > {
> > > // do something with p
> > > }
>
> > > [Test]
> > > public void Test2(Person p)
> > > {
> > > // do something with p
> > > }
>
> > > }
>
> > > Thanx
>
> > > On Jan 22, 8:27 pm, Jeff Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > If you put the factory on the constructor then the tests will appear as
> > if
> > > > the fixture was parameterized.
>
> > > > Like this:
>
> > > > Fixture({Mike})
> > > > - Test1
> > > > - Test2
> > > > Fixture({Jim})
> > > > - Test1
> > > > - Test2
>
> > > > The presentation above with {Mike} and {Jim} assumes that Person has an
> > > > overridden ToString that returns the name of the Person. If ToString
> > hasn't
> > > > been overridden then you will probably see (at least in the current
> > trunk
> > > > versions) a description of the properties that make up the person.
>
> > > > eg. Fixture({Person: Name="Jim"})
>
> > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:24 AM, max2256 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hi,
>
> > > > > Sorry if you have to repeat yourself, but what would happen if you
> > > > > put
> > > > > the factory attribute on the constructor???
>
> > > > > Would the ouptut on the runner (Icarus) look like this?
>
> > > > > -Person("Mike")
> > > > > -- Test1
> > > > > -- Test2
> > > > > -Person("Jim")
> > > > > -- Test1
> > > > > -- Test2
>
> > > > > Thanx
>
> > > > > On Jan 21, 3:50 pm, Jeff Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > There are several options here. Here are two of them:
>
> > > > > > 1. Put the row or factory attribute on the constructor.
>
> > > > > > 2. Put the attributes instead on one or more writable properties or
> > > > > fields of the class.
>
> > > > > > (Fields, properties, constructor parameters and generic type
> > parameters
> > > > > can also be bound positionally or by name using a data source
> > attribute on
> > > > > the class level. This is useful if you want to use multiple columns
> > of
> > > > > values from the same source.)
>
> > > > > > However it is not possible to parameterize setup. I think you'll
> > find
> > > > > the alternatives more than compensate.
>
> > > > > > Jeff.
>
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
> > > > > > Date: Wednesday, Jan 21, 2009 12:28 pm
> > > > > > Subject: MbUnit Re: mixture of TestSuite and DataDriven testing
> > > > > > To: "MbUnit.User" <[email protected]>Reply-To:
> > > > > [email protected]
>
> > > > > > Hi,
>
> > > > > > Suppose I want to do a similar thing AAA style. Namely, I have
> > several
> > > > > > persons created by the CreatePersons method, and for each person, I
> > > > > > want to run the Setup method (with a Person argument) and several
> > > > > > tests. So, the questions are:
> > > > > > - Can we run a parametrized [Setup] the same way as [Test]?
> > > > > > - Can we have it class-wide, i.e., put [Factory("CreatePersons")]
> > at
> > > > > > the class level?
>
> > > > > > Same question regarding the Row-style testing: can I apply the Row
> > > > > > attribute at the class level, and have all my Setup and Test
> > methods
> > > > > > parametrized the same way, parameters taken from the class level
> > > > > > attribute?
>
> > > > > > Thanks
>
> > > > > > ulu
>
> > > > > > On Jan 21, 12:46 am, Jeff Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > It looks like you're trying to produce a list of Person objects
> > to pass
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > the tests.
> > > > > > > Try this:
>
> > > > > > > public class TestFixture
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > public IEnumerable<Person> CreatePersons()
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > yield return new Person("Mike");
> > > > > > > yield return new Person("Jim");
> > > > > > > }
>
> > > > > > > [Test]
> > > > > > > [Factory("CreatePersons")]
> > > > > > > public void Test1(Person p)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > Assert.AreEqual("Max", p.Name);
> > > > > > > }
>
> > > > > > > [Test]
> > > > > > > [Factory("CreatePersons")]
> > > > > > > public void Test2(Person p)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > Assert.AreEqual("Max", p.Name);
> > > > > > > }
>
> > > > > > > }
>
> > > > > > > Here the output will look like:
>
> > > > > > > - Test1({Mike})
> > > > > > > - Test1({Jim})
> > > > > > > - Test2({Mike})
> > > > > > > - Test2({Jim})
>
> > > > > > > It should also be possible to combine data sources with suites
> > like
> > > > > this. I
> > > > > > > haven't tried it yet...
>
> > > > > > > [DynamicTestFactory]
> > > > > > > [Factory("CreatePersons")]
> > > > > > > public IEnumerable<Test> Suite(Person p)
> > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > yield return new TestCase("Test1", () => {
> > > > > > > // do something with p.
> > > > > > > });
>
> > > > > > > }
>
> > > > > > > Jeff.
>
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:52 PM, max2256 <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Hi,
>
> > > > > > > > I'm new to MbUnit. I would like to know if there is a way of
> > doing
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > following with MbUnit V3 or any MbUnit version. (mixture of
> > TestSuite
> > > > > > > > and DataDriven testing) :
>
> > > > > > > > [TestFixture]
> > > > > > > > public class TestFixture
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > [Row(typeof(Person), new Person("Max"))]
> > > > > > > > [Row(typeof(Person), new Person("Mike"))]
> > > > > > > > [Row(typeof(Person), new Person("Frank"))]
> > > > > > > > [TestSuite]
> > > > > > > > public TestSuite GetSuite(Person p)
> > > > > > > > {
> > > > > > > > // add tests to TestSuite
> > > > > > > > }- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"MbUnit.User" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/MbUnitUser?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
