Hello! > Exactly the same is needed to read uploaded files - knowledge level, > rights (i.e. shell access to the ftp server)
Even ftp access to this ftp server is enough. > and luck to read the right > files in the right time (i.e. before chmod). I mean fixed mc. Otherwise > the luck is not required :-) > > Does we want to maintain 4.5.x barnch and do users need gmc is much > > more important question. > Seriously, even Ximian didn't bother to update gmc to 4.5.55. Neither did > RedHat. What's the purpose in releasing another version that very few > people will use? Most GNOME users don't compile their sources, even if > advised of security holes. Well, I realized the volume of work if we will do at appropriative level. You assured me :-) > > > I don't think that using umask is worth the trouble, partly for the > > > reasons explained above, partly because it only affects FTP upload. > > > It also takes time to send a command and wait for the result. > > > > Well, it may be configurable option in VFS Option menu. BTW I want add > > "Use Unix ls options" there because wu-ftpd 2.6.1 understands "LIST -la" as > > "LIST -laR" and confuses mc parser. > > I thing that "umask" in the menu is an overkill. I want to leave umask question opened. > "Use Unix ls options" > should be there if only it's impossible to avoid. Even it that case, we > should try to make it remote host-specific, not user-specific. Well, my wu-ftpd does "LIST -la" absolutely right and others understands this as "LIST -lad". So, if -d option is a common place for ftp servers I will commit patch where all of occurences of "LIST -la" will be replaced by "LIST -lad" Regards, Andrew. _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
