Hi! These mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] can be related to
ncurses 5.2 turns off keypad under heavy load on xterm. Check if anything can be done about it. See last mail in link and thanks to Andrew W. Nosenko for sending these mails to me. ----- Forwarded message from "Andrew W. Nosenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- X-UIDL: 3d93f11800000003 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 10000000 Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 19:01:14 +0300 From: "Andrew W. Nosenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: (fwd) ncurses vs slang User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i -- Andrew W. Nosenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 20:07:24 -0700 From: Burton Samograd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ncurses vs slang Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-GPG-key: http://kruhftwerk.dyndns.org/kruhft.pubkey.asc X-Operating-System: Linux kruhft.dyndns.org 2.4.19-gentoo-r7 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@;mutt.org?body=unsubscribe> Hi all, I was just wondering if there was any advantage to using slang over ncurses. burton Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 05:14:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Burton Samograd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: ncurses vs slang In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@;mutt.org?body=unsubscribe> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Burton Samograd wrote: > Hi all, > > I was just wondering if there was any advantage to using slang over > ncurses. no one's pointed out any (none that count) -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 19:07:41 +0200 From: Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ncurses vs slang Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12pre7-U7 [3681] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) X-Remote-IP: 160.45.41.21 Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@;mutt.org?body=unsubscribe> * Burton Samograd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-19 03:07]: > I was just wondering if there was any > advantage to using slang over ncurses. "slang" is shorter than "ncurses" - but you have to add "--with-slang" when configuring mutt for compilation. so.... Sven [well, he asked, right?] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:16:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: ncurses vs slang In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@;mutt.org?body=unsubscribe> On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Burton Samograd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-19 03:07]: > > I was just wondering if there was any > > advantage to using slang over ncurses. > > "slang" is shorter than "ncurses" - ncurses hmm (yes - but the library is bigger, last time I looked) > but you have to add "--with-slang" > when configuring mutt for compilation. > so.... > > Sven [well, he asked, right?] > -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:58:50 +0300 From: Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ncurses vs slang Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Editor: Vim 6.1.174 (CVS) - http://www.vim.org/ X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.18 X-PGP-Key: http://erppimaa.ihku.org/~ekhowl/pubkey.asc X-URL: http://erppimaa.ihku.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@;mutt.org?body=unsubscribe> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Burton Samograd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-19 03:07]: >> I was just wondering if there was any >> advantage to using slang over ncurses. > > "slang" is shorter than "ncurses" - but you have to add > "--with-slang" when configuring mutt for compilation. so.... You have been getting worse and worse lately, Sven -- are you perhaps getting [too] old or something...? :-) - -- Jussi Ekholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://erppimaa.ihku.org/> | <0x1410081E> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9jvPqAtEARxQQCB4RAv9+AJ9eyQvD4pHXfDfB3AJ8CGekaysyqgCg0Sl4 zDoCe74jxyL7JJh29juZEzM= =P+cP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 20:54:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Alain Bench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Mutt dev ml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: ncurses vs slang Mail-Followup-To: Mutt dev ml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@;mutt.org?body=unsubscribe> Hello Burton, On Wednesday, September 18, 2002 at 8:07:24 PM -0700, Burton Samograd wrote: > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Better use the list's prefered address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I was just wondering if there was any advantage to using slang over > ncurses. I haven't precise timings, but I once noticed Slang was generally a little bit faster at redraws, scrolling, and such things. Bye! Alain. Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 18:37:04 -0400 From: Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Mutt dev ml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: ncurses vs slang Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mail-Followup-To: Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mutt dev ml <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:mutt-dev-request@;mutt.org?body=unsubscribe> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:54:40PM +0200, Alain Bench wrote: > Hello Burton, > > On Wednesday, September 18, 2002 at 8:07:24 PM -0700, Burton Samograd wrote: > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Better use the list's prefered address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I was just wondering if there was any advantage to using slang over > > ncurses. > > I haven't precise timings, but I once noticed Slang was generally > a little bit faster at redraws, scrolling, and such things. most of that was because slang doesn't pay attention to the padding specified in the vt100 entry (the numbers in <>): # Reconstructed via infocmp from file: /usr/local/ncurses/lib/terminfo/v/vt100 vt100|vt100-am|dec vt100 (w/advanced video), am, msgr, xenl, xon, cols#80, it#8, lines#24, vt#3, acsc=``aaffggjjkkllmmnnooppqqrrssttuuvvwwxxyyzz{{||}}~~, bel=^G, blink=\E[5m$<2>, bold=\E[1m$<2>, clear=\E[H\E[J$<50>, cr=^M, csr=\E[%i%p1%d;%p2%dr, cub=\E[%p1%dD, cub1=^H, cud=\E[%p1%dB, cud1=^J, cuf=\E[%p1%dC, cuf1=\E[C$<2>, cup=\E[%i%p1%d;%p2%dH$<5>, cuu=\E[%p1%dA, cuu1=\E[A$<2>, ed=\E[J$<50>, el=\E[K$<3>, el1=\E[1K$<3>, enacs=\E(B\E)0, home=\E[H, ht=^I, hts=\EH, ind=^J, ka1=\EOq, ka3=\EOs, kb2=\EOr, kbs=^H, kc1=\EOp, kc3=\EOn, kcub1=\EOD, kcud1=\EOB, kcuf1=\EOC, kcuu1=\EOA, kent=\EOM, kf0=\EOy, kf1=\EOP, kf10=\EOx, kf2=\EOQ, kf3=\EOR, kf4=\EOS, kf5=\EOt, kf6=\EOu, kf7=\EOv, kf8=\EOl, kf9=\EOw, rc=\E8, rev=\E[7m$<2>, ri=\EM$<5>, rmacs=^O, rmam=\E[?7l, rmkx=\E[?1l\E>, rmso=\E[m$<2>, rmul=\E[m$<2>, rs2=\E>\E[?3l\E[?4l\E[?5l\E[?7h\E[?8h, sc=\E7, sgr=\E[0%?%p1%p6%|%t;1%;%?%p2%t;4%;%?%p1%p3%|%t;7%;%?%p4%t;5%;m%?%p9%t\016%e\017%;$<2>, sgr0=\E[m\017$<2>, smacs=^N, smam=\E[?7h, smkx=\E[?1h\E=, smso=\E[7m$<2>, smul=\E[4m$<2>, tbc=\E[3g, See NCURSES_NO_PADDING in the ncurses manpage... -- Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net ----- End forwarded message ----- _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
