Hi! > Could you please use "diff -u" for patches? It can make them > less readable than the whole files, but at least it shows > what you are removing, not just what your are adding. It's > important to see to make sure that you are not breaking > something unintentionally. I understand it, but you can do it, too. The diff file, for editoptions can be downloadable from: http://www.wish.hu/editoptions.udiff > In fact, I cannot apply your patch unless I know that you > have made it yourself, that you have looked at it, and you > are sure that you didn't make any unintended changes. That's > not sufficient, but it's required. Nobody knows better than > you what changes were intentional. What I still have to do, that I didn't? I'm sure that I made just safe changes. I'm using the modified mc, and it works well, the changes I've made I know and I understood. So, I'm sure it is OK at this moment.
> If you used GNU indent on this function, then please check > the flags - they are documented in doc/DEVEL. And by the I just copied edit_move_to_line header, it has the same syntax. The space is there in the snapshot version, too (and not just at these routines, some other, too). Bye, Andras _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
