Quoting Leonard den Ottolander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Pavel, > > On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 19:51 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > What kind of breakage do you see or expect to see? > > Being unable to build mc on such legacy systems as the build > requirements are not met. This version bump also bumps the version > requirements for automake and autoconf.
You are supposed to build from a tarball on such systems, not from CVS. > > Darwin support without that ugly kludge in configure.ac. Less warnings > (there > > are still plenty of them in the gettext code if you run my mctest, but > neither > > of them seems to indicate a real problem). > > I'd rather live with a few redundant warnings than without a more recent > mc on such legacy systems. I'm yet to see any complaints from anyone who actually tried that. If you insist on building from CVS on legacy systems, I could write a wrapper or replacement for autopoint to ignore the version requirements for gettext. I could also ask gettext maintainers to allow support for the "at least" operator for gettext version - I think it should be safe for mc. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
