Hi Leonard, On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 21:53 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Pavel, list, > > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 14:22 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > "nm mc" shows that the only symbol from GLIBC_PRIVATE is > > __libc_enable_secure. Search for __libc_enable_secure finds it in two > > places: > > > > intl/dcigettext.c - it's only used if that file is compiled as part of > > libc, which is not the case. > > > > slang/slcommon.c - this one uses __libc_enable_secure when glibc 2.x and > > newer is used. So, I guess it's upgrading S-Lang that introduced this > > problem. > > I've removed the dependency on __libc_enable_secure in slcommon.c.
Please correct the ChangeLog entry: * slcommon.c (_pSLsecure_issetugid): Remove dependency on glibc private function __libc_enable_secure(). __libc_enable_secure is not a function, but int. The fix: http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/mc/mc/slang/slcommon.c.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2 that is done is a bad hack that just confuses a reader of code, please consider removing references to __libc_enable_secure completely. Jindrich -- Jindrich Novy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ (o_ _o) //\ The worst evil in the world is refusal to think. //\ V_/_ _\_V _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel