On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 04:09:00PM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > On Thu, 18 May 2006, Jindrich Novy wrote: > >On Wed, 2006-05-17 at 23:36 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > >>I think the patch is pretty straigth forward. I am not really sure > >>that we want to check both mc_home and mc_home_alt though. Anyway, > >>if noone objects I'll commit this patch. > > > >I would keep both checks for a while to not to break mc when someone > >decides he wants the configs in one place as it used to be > >(/usr/share/mc). On the other hand we could remove the dual checks > >after some time when the most of the mc users are aware of the > >change. I can write a patch for it as well then. > > I don't want to start a big discussion about it - either way it is > acceptable. I just occured to me that it may be confusing for the end > user if both paths are checked. > you bet it is. for example, suse-packaged kdm has a long track record of confusing the hell out of users with this approach. i'd much prefer a clean switch to sysconfdir, which is presumably what the debian packaging does.
-- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please! -- Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
