Hi Pavel, On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 16:54 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jul 2006, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > I also don't remember having major trouble with the subshell myself but > then there are enough records in this mailing list and in other places > which testify that the subshell is causing a lot of confusion.
Maybe, but as you say, nothing serious has come up. > A lot of > efforts were thrown in an attempt to solve the unsolvable "The shell is > already running a command" problem for example. Maybe we just don't understand this stuff well enough ;-) . This still feels like an "incomplete logic" issue to me. > 2) The state of the subshell is not tracked. This could be > improved but I don't think its worth the effort, IMO. So are you saying the state could be tracked better but should not be because it's too much effort? > P.S. It's sad that not so many people joined the discussion :( As long as the input is valuable :) . Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
