On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 11:04:54PM +0200, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:15:20 +0100 Oswald Buddenhagen <o...@kde.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 09:02:10PM +0100, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > > + while (...) > > > ...; > > > > > > + size_t fnlen = ...; > > > > > i should point out that this is C99 and consequently won't compile on > > many platforms with older compilers. > > declaring local variable in the middle of function? > Which widely available compilers fail to build this? > proprietary unix compilers are the unusal suspects. hp aCC being number one, immediately followed by sun studio 11 or so. or the other way round. whatever.
> I'd like to setup ones to test buildability, > or it's just -ansi -pedantic options for gcc? > works well enough. > This is not the first time we introduce such problems. I agree - we > should avoid those if it does not hurt > (like 'long long' absence or such). > bad example ... afaik, it is needed for 64-bit off_t on 32-bit systems and is thus usually suppressed with -Wno-long-long (also gcc-specific option, obviously). of course literal use of long long still needs to be avoided, but the compiler can't tell. _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
