On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen <o...@kde.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 04:49:45PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote: >> 50 milliseconds seem to work well. > > why don't you use the existing timeout? it exists exactly for this > purpose.
Good idea, I just sent an updated patch #5. (It also fixes a badly named delay_ms parameter - it was meant to be delay_us). Thanks! -- vda _______________________________________________ mc-devel mailing list https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
