On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>>> I understand that. At the moment I see that you are apparently having MC
>>> interpret escape sequences (since I do not see a mechanism for it reading
>>> the KEY_MOUSE data that ncurses would send if mousemask() were called).
>>> That is not happening on my machine, but it is a starting point.
>>
>> void init_mouse (void)
>> {
>> switch (use_mouse_p) {
>> #ifdef HAVE_LIBGPM
>> case MOUSE_NONE:
>> use_mouse_p = MOUSE_GPM;
>> break;
>> #endif /* HAVE_LIBGPM */
>> case MOUSE_XTERM_NORMAL_TRACKING:
>> case MOUSE_XTERM_BUTTON_EVENT_TRACKING:
>> define_sequence (MCKEY_MOUSE, xmouse_seq, MCKEY_NOACTION);
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> break;
>> default:
>> break;
>> }
>> enable_mouse ();
>> }
>
> To clarify:
>
> The define_sequence() call above arranges MCKEY_MOUSE to be returned from
> get_key_code() when the escape sequence "xmose_seq" is encountered in the
> input stream.
yes, I understood that by context. For whatever reason, it didn't make
the parser see a mouse event. When I made my patch, I didn't notice this
part first - I noticed the code for KEY_MOUSE and focused on making that
work, rather than seeing this and making the escape sequence work...
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
_______________________________________________
Mc mailing list
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc
