Pavel Tsekov wrote: > On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Wiseman wrote: > >> The problem Felix has is he's using a bundled binary version of MC >> which comes with SuSE 10.0. For some illogical reason, it's not >> compiled with Samba support. If he compiles it from source, he'll lose >> SuSE's nice UTF-8 patch and it'll become unusable, as SuSE's locale >> (on the other hand, rather fortunately) uses UTF-8 encoding. > > Please, calm down. I suggested to Felix to build MC from the Suse > source RPM (SRPM) for MC. I haven't verified, but I am pretty > confident that the SRPM includes all patches that Suse uses to > build the binary RPM package.
... because *not* making available sources of released binaries would be breach of GPL. SUSE lawyers would force them to release sources of all patches. Ahhhh, beauty of GPL. :-) -- Peter Masiar, Yale center for medical Informatics A: Because it messes up the flow of reading. Q: Why is top-posting often frowned upon? _______________________________________________ Mc mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc
