A thought:

...When deciding to go with an online solution, did you factor in
bandwidth costs? It looks like you may be moving a fair amount of data
around. May or may not be a problem depending on volume and the terms of
your internet connection package. Should be checked though.

I'd probably be looking at something simple and cheap involving SATA
drives in removable draws or maybe several NAS appliances. I'd have one
big "working" directory tree (500GB+?) and have something like
Microsoft's free Robocopy tool scan it daily and move everything that
hadn't been touched for 3 months (or whatever) to a second onsite
archive drive. Maybe periodically mirror that to third, which you swap
weekly with a fourth in a bank size II safety deposit box ($70 a year?).
Just thinking out loud. 

I'd be happy to talk about this further off list if that's useful. An
inexpensive, simple, archive solution would be good for a lot of small
orgs with little IT.

David

===========================================
David Marsh
Chief Technician & System Administrator
H.R. MacMillan Space Centre 
1100 Chestnut Street, Vancouver, BC V6J 3J9 
E sysadmin at hrmacmillanspacecentre.com
T (604) 738 7827 ext. 229
C (604) 813 9667 
F (604) 736 5665
=========================================== 
For your next special event or meeting, consider the unique atmosphere
of the H.R. MacMillan Space Centre.  For more information go to
www.spacecentre.ca or call (604) 738-7827 (ext 233)
  P Please consider the environment before printing e-mails
 

-----Original Message-----
From: mcn-l-bounces at mcn.edu [mailto:mcn-l-boun...@mcn.edu] On Behalf Of
Mary Bloodworth
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 12:42 PM
To: mcn-l at mcn.edu
Subject: [MCN-L] Offsite Digital Image Archive Options


I am writing to ask if any of you -- like us here at the Folger
Shakespeare Library -- are at small institutions and without major
digital asset management or IT infrastructures but nevertheless are
engaged in active digital imaging? 

 

If so, are you willing to talk (offlist or on) about your backup /
archiving schemes? We are working on establishing scalable systems
architecture and backup strategies for digital images of collection
materials, and would love to compare notes with others who have some
version of a 2-3 tier backup strategy.

 

Our current situation is this: For each digital image of collection
material, our Photography and Digital Imaging lab produces a minimum of
two images: a ca. 100-120 mb unretouched master, and a ca. 80-100 mb
cropped & color-corrected derivative. We are looking for a solution that
will permit us to archive the masters offsite. We're currently running
tape backups and taking them to a staff member's house. However, tapes
sitting on the bookshelf in a Folger staff member's house isn't good
enough anymore. 

 

What we'll need is at least 1.5 - 2 TB of space. This can be a dark
archive because we won't need frequent access, though infrequent access
would be necessary. I looked at the MCN-L archives and found one thread
from November, in which some spoke of Amazon S3. Any thoughts on this,
or a different service that's cost-effective?

 

With thanks in advance,
Mary Bloodworth

Head of Information Services

Folger Shakespeare Library

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to mcn-l, the listserv of the Museum
Computer Network (http://www.mcn.edu)

To post to this list, send messages to: mcn-l at mcn.edu

To unsubscribe or change mcn-l delivery options visit:
http://toronto.mediatrope.com/mailman/listinfo/mcn-l



Reply via email to