I agree with Bruce, however you might want to prepare your images at higher pixel dimensions anyway in order to match future higher resolution projectors as they become available. When I was at UCLA, we offered slide conversion scanning for use in PowerPoint at 1280x854 pixels, even though user's projectors were primarily XGA (1024x768) or SVGA (800x600). The resulting JPEGs ranged from 200-400k, so there really wasn't any file size penalty. Now I'm seeing "WXGA" projectors advertised, which is 1280x768. Our scanning customers will be sitting pretty if they encounter one of those!
George George Helfand Account Manager Luna Imaging, Inc. 2702 Media Center Drive Los Angeles, CA 90065-1733 Voice 800-452-LUNA (5862) Voice 323-908-1400 Fax 323-221-2846 Cell 805-905-9562 E-mail ghelfand at luna-img.com Please visit our Web site at www.LunaImaging.com > Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:38:05 -0400 > From: "Deborah Wythe" <deborahwythe at hotmail.com> > Subject: [MCN-L] DM SIG: digital projectors > To: mcn-l at mcn.edu > Message-ID: <BAY121-F2309E37C9289A0CCA75352CFE80 at phx.gbl> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed > > We've been having some discussions about the resolution of digital > projectors and the optimum size of images for projection. Since projectors > have specific pixel dimensions (just as monitors do), it seems that it's > futile to include images in PowerPoint presentations that are larger than > those dimensions. > > So for example, if the projector resolution is 1024x768, you should use > images around 1000 pixels wide, since anything larger is going to be reduced > to the projector resolution. > > Am I on the right track here? > Have people set guidelines for staff creating PowerPoint presentations to > guide them--if so, what size images do you suggest? > > Thanks, as always! > Deb Wythe > > > Deborah Wythe > Head, Digital Collections and Services > Brooklyn Museum > 200 Eastern Parkway > Brooklyn, NY 11238 > tel: 718 501 6311 > fax: 718 501 6145 > deborahwythe at hotmail.com > > Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 08:12:02 -0600 > From: Bruce Wyman <bwyman at denverartmuseum.org> > Subject: Re: [MCN-L] DM SIG: digital projectors > To: Museum Computer Network Listserv <mcn-l at mcn.edu> > Message-ID: <p0624084fc2d64270a9fa@[192.168.0.4]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" > >> So for example, if the projector resolution is 1024x768, you should use >> images around 1000 pixels wide, since anything larger is going to be reduced >> to the projector resolution. > > You're absolutely right - images larger than the maximum screen size > don't get you anything (unless the image gets cropped or only a small > portion is used). > > Two tidbits I'd pass along -- > > First, if you're using photoshop to reduce the image from its > original size, after you've shrunk use 'unsharp mask' instead of > 'sharpen' or 'sharpen more' to clean up the image. For an image > that's about 1000px wide, try something like amount: 40%, radius: > 1.4px, threshold: 5 levels. Unsharp mask really gets at the actual > edges between things and tightens those instead of the whole image. > Also sharpen a little less than you want to. > > Second, for a ppt deck when saving the image to be used, you probably > only need a jpg with about 60-80% quality. You can go higher, but > you're not going to get that much more detail and the file size will > reduce significantly. I'd be surprised if any image that was going to > be used in ppt was more than 500k. > > -bw. > -- > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > -= > Bruce Wyman, Director of Technology > Denver Art Museum / 100 W 14th Ave. Pkwy, Denver, CO 80204 > office: 720.913.0159 / fax: 720.913.0002 > <bwyman at denverartmuseum.org>
