Colleagues,

 

Apologies for any previous cross-posting, but I thought the subject may
be of interest to folks here.  I'm just following up on this digipres
conversation from early February that dealt with archiving raw still
image formats, particularly DNG.  Barry Wheeler and I presented a paper
on the topic at the recent IS&T Archiving 2010 conference in The Hague.
For anyone interested, here are links to both the paper and
presentation:

 

http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/libr_pubs/23/

 

http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/libr_pres/25/

 

Michael

 

=================================

Michael J. Bennett

Digital Projects Librarian &

Institutional Repository Coordinator

University of Connecticut

Homer Babbidge Library

369 Fairfield Way, U2005-P

Storrs, CT 06269

860-486-5276

860-486-6017 fax

http://digitalcollections.uconn.edu/

=================================

 

-----Original Message-----

From: Michael J. Bennett [mailto:[email protected]] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 4:58 PM

To: digipres at ala.org

Subject: [Digipres] RE: archiving in RAW instead of TIF

 

My co-author Barry Wheeler from the Library of Congress and I actually
have a detailed paper currently being considered for publication in
early June on this very topic.  So, stay tuned.

 

Michael

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: atroncale at yahoo.com [mailto:[email protected]] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:42 PM

To: digipres at ala.org

Subject: [Digipres] archiving in RAW instead of TIF

 

 

I did not find a discussion of the RAW format of any kind within this
list's

past posts.

 

Many institutions are struggling with multiple-terabyte archives now and


storage/maintenance costs are significant in these tight budget times.  

 

Given that many digital capture devices initially save in RAW format why
not

consider the RAW format as the preferred archival file? It allows for
on-demand

processing into TIF and when further modifications and/or adjustments
arise one

may do so from the legacy RAW file. Most important, the file size it is

significantly smaller than a TIF. 

 

If the initial capture file is in RAW why shouldn't it be the accepted
file

type for archival storage?

 

Thanks in advance for your feedback.

 

Anthony Troncale Digital Library Consulting

140 Seventh Avenue Suite #3C

New York, NY 10011

atroncale at yahoo.com

www.phobot.com

646-645-7947

 


Reply via email to