>Thread-Topic: VRA Intellectual Property Rights News: April 2008
>Thread-Index: AcirjEDH1latpA1bTRK5kwSoMrL1Vw==
>Date:         Thu, 1 May 2008 09:07:06 -0400
>Reply-To:     Visual Resources Association <VRA-L at LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
>Sender:       Visual Resources Association <VRA-L at LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
>From:         Jen Green <jgreen at NHIA.EDU>
>Subject: VRA Intellectual Property Rights News: April 2008
>To:           VRA-L at LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
>List-Help: <http://listserv.uark.edu/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=VRA-L>,
>            <mailto:LISTSERV at LISTSERV.UARK.EDU?body=INFO VRA-L>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:VRA-L-unsubscribe-request at LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
>List-Subscribe: <mailto:VRA-L-subscribe-request at LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
>List-Owner: <mailto:VRA-L-request at LISTSERV.UARK.EDU>
>List-Archive: <http://listserv.uark.edu/scripts/wa.exe?LIST=VRA-L>
>X-ELNK-Received-Info: spv=0;
>X-ELNK-AV: 0
>X-ELNK-Info: sbv=0; sbrc=.0; sbf=00; sbw=000;
>
>IPR- In the News?
>Compiled by Jen Green, New Hampshire Institute of Art
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Press Release: Study Group Issues Report 
>Recommending Changes in Copyright Law to Reflect 
>Digital Technologies
>News from the Library of Congress, March 31, 2008
><http://www.loc.gov/today/pr/2008/08-063.html>http://www.loc.gov/today/pr/2008/08-063.html
>
>After nearly three years of intensive work, the 
>independent Section 108 Study Group has issued 
>its report and recommendations on exceptions to 
>copyright law to address how libraries, archives 
>and museums deal with copyrighted materials in 
>fulfilling their missions in the digital 
>environment. Section 108 is the section of the 
>Copyright Act that provides limited exceptions 
>for libraries and archives so that they may make 
>copies to replace copyrighted works in their 
>collections when necessary, preserve them for 
>the long term and make them available to users.
>
>See article below: "Section Eight Study Group"
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Section Eight Study Group
><http://www.section108.gov/>http://www.section108.gov/
>
>The Section 108 Study Group is a select 
>committee of copyright experts charged with 
>updating for the digital world the Copyright 
>Act's balance between the rights of creators and 
>copyright owners and the needs of libraries and 
>archives. The Study Group was convened as an 
>independent group by the National Digital 
>Information Infrastructure and Preservation 
>program of the Library of Congress and by the 
>U.S. Copyright Office. The recommendations, 
>conclusions, and other outcomes of the Study 
>Group's Report are its own and do not reflect 
>the opinions of the Library of Congress or the 
>U.S. Copyright Office.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Is Sharing a Folder Copyright Infringement?
>by Andrew Orlowski, The Register, April 2, 2008
><http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/02/elektra_barker_dismissal_rejection/>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/04/02/elektra_barker_dismissal_rejection/
>
>A US Judge on Monday upheld the view that 
>sharing copyrighted music is infringement. It's 
>a defeat for defendant Denise Barker and the 
>Electronic Frontier Foundation, and a victory 
>for the four record labels in the case, led by 
>Warner's Elektra.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Court Protects Students -- for Now -- in Battle With Music Industry
>by Josh Fischman, The Chronicle of Higher 
>Education: Wired Campus, April 4, 2008
><http://tinyurl.com/5lowp5>http://tinyurl.com/5lowp5
>
>Four Boston University students, accused of 
>pirating music with their computers, got a 
>sympathetic ruling this week from a federal 
>judge. The ruling notes that the students' 
>privacy and First Amendment rights might have 
>been violated.
>
>See related topic below: "Boston U. Students 
>Tell Judge: Recording Industry Group Uses 
>Unsavory Business"
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Big Content in Worldwide "whisper campaign" Against Fair Use
>by Nate Anderson, Ars Technica, April 7, 2008
><http://tinyurl.com/3qxgb8>http://tinyurl.com/3qxgb8
>
>"If you've been following copyright debates for 
>more than, say, 10 minutes, you're probably 
>aware that "some rights good, more rights 
>better!" might well be the motto of many content 
>owners. Fair use and fair dealing put 
>limitations on these otherwise exclusive rights, 
>and they do so on the theory that copyright is 
>not an absolute right to control and profit from 
>every single use of a particular work. News 
>reporting, classroom use, commentary, parody; in 
>the US, at least, these don't require either 
>permission or payment. But content owners aren't 
>necessarily down with this way of thinking, and 
>copyright expert William Patry believes that a 
>"counter-reformation" is in the works to crimp 
>worldwide plans to expand fair use."
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Does Selling Lecture Notes Violate Professors' Copyrights?
>by Catherine Rampell, The Chronicle of Higher 
>Education: Wired Campus, April 7, 2008
><http://tinyurl.com/44wfdc>http://tinyurl.com/44wfdc
>
>A University of Florida professor is suing a 
>company that sells students' lecture notes 
>because he says the service infringes on his 
>intellectual property rights, Wired reports.
>
>______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Creative Commons Gets $4 Million Grant, loses CEO Lessig
>by Caroline McCarthy, c | net news, April 7, 2008
><http://www.news.com/8301-13577_3-9909027-36.html>http://www.news.com/8301-13577_3-9909027-36.html
>
>Creative Commons, the nonprofit dedicated to 
>reforming copyright in the digital age, said it 
>has received a $4 million grant from the William 
>and Flora Hewlett Foundation. Meanwhile, 
>Lawrence Lessig, the organization's founder, a 
>Stanford law professor, and a "free culture" 
>advocate, is stepping down from his role as CEO 
>of Creative Commons.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Mind Your Own Business: You Will Lose the Rights to Your Own Art
>by Mark Simon, Animation World Magazine, April 10, 2008
><http://mag.awn.com/index.php?ltype=pageone&article_no=3605&page=1>http://mag.awn.com/index.php?ltype=pageone&article_no=3605&page=1
>
>"As you know, I usually handle the subjects in 
>my articles with a sense of humor. That is not 
>the case this month. I find nothing funny about 
>the new Orphan Works legislation that is before 
>Congress."
>
>See related response articles below: "Six 
>Misconceptions about Orphaned Works;" "Recent 
>Orphan Works FUD;"
>See also: "Press Release: Groups Praise Orphan 
>Works Legislation Introduced In Senate and 
>House;" "Blog: Orphan Works 2008: House and 
>Senate Bills Introduced"
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Boston U. Students Tell Judge: Recording Industry Group Uses Unsavory Business
>by Andrea Foster, Chronicle of Higher Education: Wired Campus, April 10, 2008
><http://tinyurl.com/54hpwt>http://tinyurl.com/54hpwt
>
>The latest chapter to the file-sharing battle 
>between some Boston University students and the 
>recording industry centers on MediaSentry.  The 
>business tries to ferret out copyright violators 
>by scouring peer-to-peer networks for the 
>Internet-protocol numbers of students who swap 
>music online. The business downloads some songs 
>and takes a snapshot of the students' music 
>files. The Recording Industry Association of 
>America has been using MediaSentry to help 
>identify students who the industry-group later 
>sues.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Europe Votes Against Online Copyright Law
>by Mike Sachoff, WebProNews, April 11, 2008
><http://tinyurl.com/492mp2>http://tinyurl.com/492mp2
>
>The European Parliament shot down the proposal 
>to ban file sharing by private individuals and 
>dropped the idea to bar copyright abusers from 
>the Internet. In a close vote, 314 Members of 
>the European Parliament voted to reject an 
>amendment that would have protected copyright on 
>the Internet and 297 voted against throwing out 
>the amendment.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Blog: Radio Free Meredith: Six Misconceptions about Orphaned Works
>by Meredith L. Patterson, April 12, 2008
><http://maradydd.livejournal.com/374886.html>http://maradydd.livejournal.com/374886.html
>
>"My friends list today has been swept by a storm 
>of fear, uncertainty and doubt surrounding the 
>article by Mark Simon on Animation World Network 
>about the issue of orphaned works. "Orphaned 
>works" are creations likely still under 
>copyright -- photographs, illustrations, written 
>works, music, &c. -- for which the original 
>creator cannot be found, and thus their 
>copyright status cannot be determined. Orphaned 
>works present a thorny problem in today's 
>litigious society, because when the question of 
>"who owns X?" can't be answered, very few people 
>are willing to do anything with X if they fear 
>that they'll be sued for it."
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Blog: Public Knowledge: Recent Orphan Works FUD
>by Alex Curtis, April 14, 2008
><http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1518>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1518
>
>"Mark Simon wrote in Animation World Magazine 
>last week about orphan works. I presume it was 
>meant to be an in depth analysis of current 
>orphan works legislation, but unfortunately he 
>does himself and his readers a disservice 
>because the article was factually shallow and 
>didn't accurately portray anything ever offered 
>up by this or previous Congresses."
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>International Lobby asks US to Elevate Lebanon's 
>Grade on Intellectual Property
>by Michael Bluhm, Daily Star Lebanon, April 14, 2008
><http://tinyurl.com/4fnhbq>http://tinyurl.com/4fnhbq
>
>The International Intellectual Property Alliance 
>(IIPA) has asked the US Trade Representative 
>(USTR) to upgrade Lebanon from the Priority Watch
>
>List for serious infringements of intellectual 
>property rights and severe copyright problems to 
>the Watch List, said a report in the latest 
>edition of Byblos Bank's Lebanon This Week.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Analysis: Is The Website Owner Responsible For User Generated Content?
>by David Oxenford, DigitalMediaWire, April 14, 2008
><http://tinyurl.com/3zzo5s>http://tinyurl.com/3zzo5s
>
>Website operators who allow the posting of 
>user-generated content on their sites enjoy 
>broad immunity from legal liability. This 
>includes immunity from copyright violations if 
>the site owner registers with the Copyright 
>Office, does not encourage the copyright 
>violations and takes down infringing content 
>upon receiving notice from a copyright owner.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>New Copyright Laws Hoped to Embrace the Digital Age
>TV3 News, April 14, 2008
><http://tinyurl.com/3mwkjx>http://tinyurl.com/3mwkjx
>
>Parliament has given New Zealand's outdated 
>copyright laws a reboot to embrace the digital 
>age. While it has addressed concerns with music 
>copyright, many say it has failed to grasp the 
>place of video in the modern online world.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Stanford Law School's Fair Use Project Defends 
>RDR Books Against Copyright Lawsuit Brought by 
>J.K. Rowling and Warner Bros.
>
>BusinessWire, April 14, 2008
><http://tinyurl.com/4wgu2c>http://tinyurl.com/4wgu2c
>
>A federal court in New York will hear opening 
>arguments today over whether an independent book 
>publisher has the right to publish the Harry 
>Potter Lexicon, an unofficial reference guide to 
>the Harry Potter series of books and movies. In 
>a trial that is expected to last two to three 
>days, attorneys from the Fair Use Project of 
>Stanford Law School's Center for Internet and 
>Society, along with co-counsel, will argue that 
>their client, RDR Books, has the right to 
>publish the Lexicon under the fair use doctrine.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Press Release: Georgia State University 
>Copyright Infringement Suit Filed In Atlanta 
>Federal Court
>The Association of American Publishers, April 16, 2008
><http://www.publishers.org/main/PressCenter/GeorgiaStateLawsuitRelease.htm>http://www.publishers.org/main/PressCenter/GeorgiaStateLawsuitRelease.htm
>
>Atlanta: A group of publishers filed suit in 
>federal court late yesterday to stop widespread 
>copyright infringement at Georgia State 
>University (GSU). The complaint, filed by Oxford 
>University Press, Cambridge University Press and 
>SAGE Publications and supported by the 
>Association of American Publishers (AAP), 
>charges that GSU officials are violating the law 
>by systematically enabling professors to provide 
>students with digital copies of copyrighted 
>course readings published by the plaintiffs and 
>numerous other publishers without those 
>publishers' authorization. The lawsuit seeks 
>injunctive relief to bring an end to such 
>practices, but does not seek monetary damages.
>
>See related articles below: "Publishers Sue 
>Georgia State on Digital Reading Matter;" "Blog: 
>(C)ollectanea: Suing Georgia"
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Publishers Sue Georgia State on Digital Reading Matter
>by Katie Hafner, New York Times, April 16, 2008
><http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/16/technology/16school.html>http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/16/technology/16school.html
>
>Three prominent academic publishers are suing 
>Georgia State University, contending that the 
>school is violating copyright laws by providing 
>course reading material to students in digital 
>format without seeking permission from the 
>publishers or paying licensing fees.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Judge's Ruling in Copyright Case Lets College Off but Not Lecturer
>by Andrea Foster, Chronicle of Higher Education: Wired Campus, April 16, 2008
><http://tinyurl.com/5m4tb9>http://tinyurl.com/5m4tb9
>
>It's a case that has some copyright scholars 
>scratching their heads. A judge exonerates a 
>university that is accused of infringing the 
>copyright of a company's research report. But 
>the judge rules that an employee of the 
>university might be culpable of the same 
>activity.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Blog: Patry - British Copyright Industry's New Perverse Copyright Theory
>by Drew Wilson, ZeroPaid.com, April 18, 2008
><http://tinyurl.com/6sarct>http://tinyurl.com/6sarct
>
>"When one makes a private copy of a copyrighted 
>work for non-commercial purposes, many Americans 
>think of fair use and end the debate. In 
>Britain, the copyright industry is responding to 
>what Americans would classify as "fair use" as 
>something that should have a licensing fee. "
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Blog: ZeroPaid.com: New Zealand and Germany Reform Copyright Laws in 4 Days
>by Drew Wilson, April 21, 2008
><http://tinyurl.com/5b6b3c>http://tinyurl.com/5b6b3c
>
>"Internet Service Providers and the copyright 
>industry weren't the only ones busy on the 
>copyright front these days. New Zealand reformed 
>their copyright laws which was followed up by 
>Germany four days later."
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Press Release: Copyright Clearance Center
>Danvers, Mass., April 24, 2008
><http://www.copyright.com/ccc/viewPage.do?pageCode=au158>http://www.copyright.com/ccc/viewPage.do?pageCode=au158
>
>Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) today announced 
>a set of major enhancements to Rightsphere, the 
>company's award-winning rights advisory and 
>management tool. Driven by input from leading 
>corporate information managers and librarians, 
>these changes make it possible to manage complex 
>rights and licenses with precision and speed.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Press Release: Groups Praise Orphan Works 
>Legislation Introduced In Senate and House
>Public Knowledge, April 24, 2008
><http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1538>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1538
>
>Public Knowledge, the Internet Archive, 
>Association of Public Television Stations and 
>the Association of Research Libraries joined 
>today to praise the work of Senate and House 
>legislators for introducing legislation that 
>would allow for greater use of "orphan works." 
>Those are books, music, photos or other works 
>for which the copyright holder can't be found by 
>someone who wants to use the work in a way that 
>normally would require permission.
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Blog: Orphan Works 2008: House and Senate Bills Introduced
>by Alex Curtis, Public Knowledge, April 24, 2008
><http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1537>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1537
>
>"Two orphan works bills were introduced to begin 
>to bring balance back to copyright law--to help 
>find owners and encourage new and creative uses 
>of unexploited copyrighted works. Both the U.S. 
>Senate and House of Representatives have 
>introduced orphan works legislation (S. 2913, 
>the Shawn Bentley Orphan Works Act of 2008, H.R. 
>5889: The Orphan Works Act of 2008), rooted in 
>the same language based on the previous Smith 
>Bill, which was based on the Copyright Office's 
>recommendation."
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Blog: (C)ollectanea: How to Kill an Orphan Works Bill in 2 Easy Lessons
>by Georgia Harper, , April 26, 2008
><http://tinyurl.com/6zqncr>http://tinyurl.com/6zqncr
>
>"Public Knowledge (who works tirelessly on 
>behalf of documentary filmmakers) announced on 
>Thursday that two bills addressing orphan works 
>had been introduced: Orphan Works 2008: House 
>and Senate Bills Introduced. As usual, I urge 
>you to read the bills. Public Knowledge has 
>links to both of them. And read Public 
>Knowledge's assessment. You're not going to get 
>their type of assessment here."
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>Blog: (C)ollectanea: Suing Georgia
>by Georgia Harper, April 26, 2008
><http://chaucer.umuc.edu/blogcip/collectanea/2008/04/suing_georgia_1.html>http://chaucer.umuc.edu/blogcip/collectanea/2008/04/suing_georgia_1.html
>
>"I have taken nearly a week to mull over this 
>case that has been buzzing around the 
>blogosphere, around email and even in real life, 
>and I'm glad I did. I think I see it more 
>clearly now than I did a week ago when the news 
>first hit. I managed with a little time to 
>connect it up with everything else in my life, 
>well, my copyright life."
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>
>US Releases List of Copyright Infringing Nations; India Among Top 9
>domain-b.com, April 27, 2008
><http://www.domain-b.com/economy/trade/20080426_infringing.html>http://www.domain-b.com/economy/trade/20080426_infringing.html
>
>The United States on Friday named China and 
>Russia as among the worst protectors of 
>intellectual property rights, flooding global 
>trade with counterfeit items such as DVDs, 
>designer bags, medicines and software, although 
>it remarked that notable progress has been made 
>in the recent past to address these problems. 
>These assertions were made in the annual 
>''Special 301'' Report released by the office of 
>the United States Trade Representative (USTR).
>
>_______________________________________________________________________________________
>Many thanks to all of our VRA-IPR members who 
>are monitoring multiple listservs to make this 
>IPR news posting possible! Please submit any 
>comments, questions, or suggestions to Jen Green 
>at jgreen at nhia.edu.
>
>
>Jen Green, Interim Director
>New Hampshire Institute of Art
>Teti Library


-- 
Diane M. Zorich
113 Gallup Road
Princeton, NJ 08542 USA
Voice: 609-252-1606
Fax: 609-252-1607
Email:  dzorich at mindspring.com

Reply via email to