Cairie,

The one advantage of having the data in a spreadsheet (besides being able
to filter and search) would be that if your museum ever does implement a
CMS or DAMS, you can pretty easily import your records directly into the
new platform in xml format.

Regards, Matt


On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Cairie Riney <cairie.bird at gmail.com> wrote:

> I have a question about photo metadata and how to record it. So while
> digitizing negatives, I've been recording the metadata into an excel
> sheet. I'm following Dublin Core and added some preservation metadata
> fields. Anywho, considering the institution I'm volunteering for
> doesn't have a DAMS or CMS, I was thinking of embedding the metadata
> using Photoshop. I successfully completed one image's embedded
> metadata and it wasn't difficult or too time consuming. The REAL
> question is...is it worth it? Should I just be doing the Dublin Core
> metadata in the Excel sheet OR just the IPTC metadata in Photoshop? Or
> is both great? Ultimately, I want to prep these photos so that if/when
> they do get a DAMS, they'll be easily added to the system with all
> their information.
>
> Any input or completely different suggestions would be greatly appreciated
> :D
> Thank you!!
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to mcn-l, the listserv of the Museum Computer
> Network (http://www.mcn.edu)
>
> To post to this list, send messages to: mcn-l at mcn.edu
>
> To unsubscribe or change mcn-l delivery options visit:
> http://mcn.edu/mailman/listinfo/mcn-l
>
> The MCN-L archives can be found at:
> http://toronto.mediatrope.com/pipermail/mcn-l/
>



-- 
Matt Wheeler,
Photography Archives,
Penobscot Marine Museum
Archives (207) 548-2529 ext. 211

Reply via email to