|
In the interests of clarity, here are the original passages from Judge Scalia's opinion - a bit different from they way they were "quoted" in the NYT:
"To hold otherwise would be akin to finding that ยง43(a) created a species of perpetual patent and copyright, which Congress may not do. See Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U. S. 186, 208 (2003). ""In general, unless an intellectual property right such as a patent or copyright protects an item, it will be subject to copying.. TrafFix Devices,Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc., 532 U. S. 23, 29 (2001). The rights of a patentee or copyright holder are part of a .carefully crafted bargain,. Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., 489 U. S. 141, 150.151 (1989), under which, once the patent or copyright monopoly has expired, the public may use the invention or work at will and without attribution. Thus, in construing the Lanham Act, we have been careful to caution against misuse or overextension of trademark and related protections into areas traditionally occupied by patent or copyright. TrafFix, 532 U. S., at 29."----- Original Message -----
From: Amalyah Keshet
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:22 AM
Subject: IP SIG: Important Victory for the Public Domain Important Victory for the Public Domain
[from SIVACRACY.NET: Siva Vaidhyanathan' Weblog http://www.nyu.edu/classes/siva/]
According to Michael Geist of BNA: amalyah keshet --- head of image resources & copyright management the israel museum, jerusalem www.imj.org.il tel +972-2-670-8874 fax +972-2-670-8064 You are currently subscribed to mcn_mcn-l as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [email protected] --- You are currently subscribed to mcn_mcn-l as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [email protected] |
