James Tisdale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> That and the fact that the 702M is supposed to have fixed the UTOC >> problems... > >If the 702MK us supposed to have fixed the UTOC problems then way is my unit >gone into Sharp for a good two weeks to be fixed? Probably because of bad luck. Seriously. The 702M was supposed to be a "fix" model that avoided UTOC problems. From what I have seen around the web and from retail/service places, it worked and UTOC errors are very rare on the "M". However, there is a very small chance that the error can still occur (now it's just like any other problem -- if you're unlucky, something can go wrong). You happen to be one of the "lucky" ones :-( ----------------------------------------------------------------- To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
