I'm also an R50 owner and I like mine just fine. The only problem I have is
the liquid crystal displays are not back lit.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 5:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MD: MZ-R50 or Sharp 821



Well, being an R50 owner and user, I'm a bit biased towards getting that
one.
Is the one you're looking at new or used? If it's new, grab it and don't
even
dare to have a second thought.  If you're picking it up second hand I'd be
a bit leary, just because it is portable and a great workhorse, how much
life
may be left in it, and how it was treated up till now.  Though I have
nothing
against the 821, I don't think it would be a mistake to grab the R50 while
you can.

-Jeffrey

--
My reality check just bounced!

On Wed, 12 Jan 2000, Matt Vukin wrote:

>
> I know this is probably uninteresting to a lot of you, but it would really
help me out if you could give me your feedback on these two units; the
MZ-R50 and the Sharp 821.  I can get the R50 for $170 or pay close to $300
for the 821.  I only have the opportunity to get the Sony that cheap for a
couple days though.  Do you think I should grab it while I can since it has
been called such a great unit and with the low price?  -or is the 821 worth
the greater cost? (this is the other one I have seriously considered)  Any
other suggestions would be appreciated - but the most valuable to me will be
info related to the two mentioned units.
>
> THANK YOU!
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to