Nick Perry wrote:
>
> FWIW, this has been discussed a few times in the past. I used to be of
> the opion that Reply-to should be set to sender but the original
> consensus was for reply-to to be set to the list. On reflection, it is
> the right choice for this type of list. I have other lists with
> reply-to set to the sender which cuts down traffic considerably - but
> they are lists that go wildly off topic all the time.
I was on a list like that once too, where Reply-to was to the sender.
VERY little traffic on that list, LOTS of questions, never an answer!
Even when I'd search through their archives... all questions and no
answers.
I think all answers were sent via private email, because even I asked a
lot of questions and received privately emailed answers. How boring,
especially when IMO, answers should be shared so those of us who had
similar questions can benefit.
> Anyhow. The matter is not up for re-consideration. Reply-to will remain
> set to the list on MD-L.
Good!
Shawn
__________________________________________
NetZero - Defenders of the Free World
Get your FREE Internet Access and Email at
http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
