Didn't I hear that on the TV show "Millennium?"
I'm not doing any flaming here and apologize for getting off of the topic, but
that is one of those cryptic statements that people like Chris Carter write that
really have no meaning in the real world.
Saying that without evil there could be no good is like saying that in space you
would be weightless and then since you had no substance you would not exist. If
there was no evil we might not have the word good. But it is just a question of
all things being relative. There would actually be only good, but since there
was no evil, what we now consider good would just be "normal".
You can apply this concept to all opposites. Pretty and ugly; big and small;
smart and dumb; etc. It's all just semantics
regards,
Larry
PrinceGaz wrote:
> From: "Peter Forest" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Think you may like this...
> > "Good needs evil if it is to be able to manifest itself. Without evil, good
> > will go to sleep, because there is nothing left to stimulate it. Evil
> > excites good, stimulates good and good is then able to manifest itself. It
> >(snip...)
> > Peter
>
> I was expecting a funnmy comment about Sony and Sharp at the end here,
> still the philosophising about good and evil was interesting, and indeed
> true.
>
> PrinceGaz.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
