Someone wrote:
> >, and one should keep in mind that the 702 offered several
> > > 'advantages' over the MZ-R30 which had the same price, notable size and the
> > > LiIon battery.
I had a Sharp 702 and a Sony R30. Bothe came with rechargable LiIon
battires. I got the Sharp because it was smaller than the R30 and
cheaper.
I got shet of it becuase it was thicker than the Sony R-30, didn't have
the time stamp feature I wanted, didn't have automatic record level
control I wanted, and the LiIon battery didn't last as long as the
R-30. I did not see any advantages of the 702 over the R30. A friend
got the Shaarp 702 after havingit for a coupple weeks, she saw my R-30
she took her 702 back and got the R-30 instead. She was much happier
with it.
> >
> > Sony's end of search thing alone seems to be a major reason for not buying a Sony.
It is a pain in the but, but I'd take my Sony over the Sharp any day.
--
Jim Coon
Not just another pretty mandolin picker.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If Gibson made cars, would they sound so sweet?
My first web page
http://www.tir.com/~liteways
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
