This is off topic , but since Eric's URL is totally off topic I feel I
am justified in continuing the thread<G>.

First of all, great article!!  I have never seen all of the variables
involving a placebo so clearly laid out.

Being trained as a conventional practitioner of medical treatment (both
in pharmacology and dentistry) have always tended to rule out anything
that can not be clearly documented and have looked upon "alternative
medicine" as witch craft.  But as I have grown older and had more life
experiences, I have come to understand the human "machine" more fully
and with a much more opened mind.

The ability to cure by simply using the mind is not Voo Doo, but based
on sound scientific principle.  I has it's limitations and varies from
person to person.  Also the term psychosomatic does not necessarily mean
that a person does not have an illness (although that is the general
usage of the word).

Our brains do much more then simply interpret senses make decisions and
allow us to do physical things, etc.  They can send signals to parts of
the body that are capable of releasing "drugs" that will affect our well
being.

Just because a person's test results all come back negative does not
mean that the person is not ill (again the term psychosomatic).  It may
simply indicate that we have yet to discover the test to diagnosis the
illness.

Actually this is not off topic, since all of this can be applied to our
perception and testing of sound.  If we relied strictly on measurements
by instruments of our own design, a piece of audio reproductive
electronics might appear to be inferior or superior.

The fact is there is a vast difference between an oscilloscope and the
human "instrument".

One last thing that a statement about the origins of the term placebo
remind me of;

"The word placebo (�I will please� in Latin) entered the English
language by way of a            peculiar mistranslation of the 116th
Psalm that read, �I will please the Lord� rather               than �I
will walk before the Lord�".

I constantly hear people using the term "Thou Shall Not Kill" as one of
the Ten Commandments.  This too is a mistranslation of the ancient
Hebrew.  The actual phrase states "Thou Shall Not Murder".

Anyone reading this e mail has either stopped before this point for lack
of interest or is thinking, "there the same thing".  But that is not
true.  The term kill applies to the taking of any life for any reason.
While the term murder is the unjustified taking of a life.

There are times when it may be morally justified to take the life of
another.  Such as self defense.  My religion not only allows you to use
self defense, but rather commands you to do everything within you power
to prevent the unjustified attempt at taking you life at the hand of
another.  Everything short of the killing of an innocent to preserve
your own life.  In that case, you are expected to martyr yourself.

Sorry for getting off topic.  Blame it at least in small part on
Rick<G>.

Larry

Eric Woudenberg wrote:

> Nice article on the placebo effect in medicine:
>      http://pubs.acs.org/hotartcl/mdd/99/aug/mysterious.html
>
> Rick
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to