> "Even the most expensive test equipment doesn't measure subtle differences
> well. The human ear is more sensitive than the most expensive "equipment"
> in the world."
This is a very important point. Although there are some quantitative tests
that are of value, when you are talking about things like audio or video,
everyone is going to hear and see things slightly differently.
I think that you reach a point where you begin paying for air when it comes
to so called high end.
If you want to you can go crazy with theories and think that you are 100%
sure that the $10,000 power amp is much better then the $1500.00 receiver.
Where do you draw the line? Bi amps? Tri amplification??
There are limitations to human hearing. At some point you will reach a point
where you are not hearing "better" sound only different sound.
Take the Sub woofer for example. The theory is always thrown out that very
low frequencies are not directional and therefore you do not need separate
right and left subwoofers. But has anyone actually tried using a separate
subwoofer for each channel?
There is a difference in the sound and feel. Yes I say feel because at some
point frequencies are so low that you feel them as much as hear them.
Just my 2 cents plain (joke for any old timers like me-No I'm not going to
start the Historical Bum song again don't worry)
Larry
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
