Hahaha.
That's a joke, right?
It's impossible to OBJECTIVELY say what 'sounds better' by definition.
Anyway, semantics aside, that wasn't my point, which was that the person who
said in conversation that MiniDisc is just lo-fi trash could simply have
stumbled across the same reports that I have read on the Internet saying
Sharp ATRAC **sounds** bad compared to the original CD (which I just happen
to agree with, and which I read after I had happened to form exactly the
same opinion on my own)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stainless Steel Rat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "MD-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 3:01 AM
Subject: Re: MD: MD for recording sound for film?
> There are detectable differences between the two encoders. You know what
> those differences are, you know how to pick them out.
>
> Therefore, I think it is impossible for you to be objective no matter what
> you do, because you will subconsciously or consciously invalidate any
tests
> you might try.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
