> I don't think cassettes were *ever* considered "high-end." When they were > introduced, the quality of reel-to-reel tape was vastly superior... just > hard to take with you on a jog ;) Cassettes were introduced as a > portable, but lower-quality, music source. You're right. Regardless of the quality, technologies are bound to line themselves up in the consumer markets. Cassettes were only high-end when they were rare, and expensive, somewhat in the same way MiniDisc or DAT formats are in the consumer (not pro) markets today. It just so happens that MiniDisc and DAT are also technically high-end as well. ----------------------------------------------------------------- To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: MD: MD Dan Frakes
- Re: MD: MD Dave Kimmel
- Re: MD: MD Stainless Steel Rat
- Re: MD: MD las
- MD: ATRAC & loseless compression techniqu... Anthony Lalande
- Re: MD: ATRAC & loseless compression ... Dave Kimmel
- Re: MD: ATRAC & loseless compression ... Stainless Steel Rat
- Re: MD: ATRAC & loseless compress... Anthony Lalande
- Re: MD: ATRAC & loseless com... Stainless Steel Rat
- Re: MD: ATRAC & loseless... Anthony Lalande
- Re: MD: MD Anthony Lalande
- Re: MD: MD Francisco J. Huerta
- Re: MD: lossless compression David W. Tamkin
- Re: MD: lossless compression Francisco J. Huerta
- Re: MD: lossless compression Anthony Lalande
- Re: MD: lossless compression Steve Corey
- Re: MD: lossless compression Stainless Steel Rat
- Re: MD: lossless compression JT
- Re: MD: lossless compression Matt Wall
- Re: MD: MD Dan Frakes
