For serious listening or recording maybe, but when I bought my md player
(sharp mt77) I wanted something that could fill the role of a portable mp3
player but have the benifits of a tape/cd portable(like not having to spend
an arm and a leg on additional storage) without being as bulky. There was
the added benifit of knowing that mds had been around for a while so I
probably wasn't going to see a new line come out the week after I bought my
unit with 200% improvement over the old stuff. *grumble grumble stupid tech
industry*
Anyway I havent noticed any reason why LP2 isnt good enough for 90% of my
day to day (aka non serious) use. Maybe LP4 would be good for that long
noisy bus ride, but LP2 seems fine for a jog in the park or a car trip or
just bumming around listening to music.
-Jen
> I guess it would sound good if you always listened to it in heavy
> traffic riding on the bus. I think for serious listening or recording,
> you are better off with standard MD.
>
> Some infidels look down on MD as inferior because it uses ATRAC in the
> first place, can you imagine their comments on the new LP stuff. "Wow,
> have you heard those MD recorders? They sure play a long time but the
> sound is crap!"
>
>
> Just my humble opinion of course. I'll stick to regular MD any time.
>
> I have recorded on my R30 and got a copy that was good enough to submit
> for a CD compilation, and so have a lot of other people. I'm sure they
> won't be able to do that with the LP mode.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
