I dont know what encoder your using, but personally i can still hear a
difference between 192 and an original CD, espeically with horns and
extremely tight low's. yes i've tried many different encoders and i havn't
found one that doesn't do this. also i run both through a pretty good
system to test this theory. pioneer elite cd player, Rotel Amp's, B&W
nautilus speakers, Marantz Preamp, Maudio DIO 2496 sound card. if you dont
like that equipment your too big of an audio snob and you shouldn't be even
thinking of MD or MP3 :P
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Capps" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: MD: Best buy, phasing out MD equip ??
>
> From: "las" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > I disagree about the quality of MP3s and seriously doubt that you can
tell
> the difference between an MP3 recorded at the "standard" 128 and 192Kbps.
> All you are doing is using up more disc space.
>
> You can disagree all you like Larry. But in AB comparison where A is the
> original cd and B is a 192kbps mp3 file, the file is sonically
> indistinguishable from the original cd. That was my point. And yes, that
is
> on a high quality playback system. My Turtle Beach soundcard has RCA
stereo
> outputs being fed to a Denon integrated amp driving Mission speakers and
an
> old M&K sub which I retired a few years back from my main home theater
> system.
>
> Don C.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
> "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
