> Using the system you described, the problem with the sound > probably has very > little to do with the MD format. The 530 has crappy converters. So this may be the reason why my recordings and playbacks with Sony's MZ-R 70 seem so low on quality. If ATRAC is the same in every machine, the difference comes from what is before and after this compression, hence the need to know what we buy (this is very difficult to know, indeed). By the way, is this what the ATRAC type R does (as Matt would suggest)? Is this type R specific to Sony and superior to other makers' solutions as far as converters and signal processors are concerned? Francis ----------------------------------------------------------------- To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: MD: More on CD vs. MD Sound ... las
- Re: MD: More on CD vs. MD So... John Small
- Re: MD: More on CD vs. MD So... John Small
- Re: MD: More on CD vs. MD So... Francisco J. Huerta
- Re: MD: More on CD vs. MD Sound Quali... Timothy Stockman
- MD: ATRAC and stereo (was more o... David W. Tamkin
- Re: MD: More on CD vs. MD Sound Quali... Eric Woudenberg, Minidisc.org Editor
- Re: MD: More on CD vs. MD Sound Quali... Ivica Petrovic
- Re: MD: More on CD vs. MD Sound ... las
- Re: MD: More on CD vs. MD So... Francis Auquier
- Re: MD: More on CD vs. M... John Small
- Re: MD: More on CD v... John Small
- Re: MD: More on CD v... Stainless Steel Rat
- Re: MD: More on... John Small
- Re: MD: More on CD vs. MD Sound Quali... Timothy Stockman
- Re: MD: More on CD vs. MD Sound ... John Small
- RE: MD: More on CD vs. MD So... Francis Auquier
- Re: MD: More on CD vs. M... John Small
- Re: MD: More on CD vs. MD Sound Quali... Anthony Jukes
- Re: MD: More on CD vs. MD Sound Quali... Matt Wall
