===================================================
= NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please =
= be more selective when quoting text =
===================================================
At last! I must admit the below diagrams are exactly how I interpreted
the problem from the start, and then kept reading countless posts which
seemed to be implying/answering a different problem. Sometimes "error-
correction" can lead to problems :-)
As you say David, the headphones probably are unnecessary for mobile use,
while on the move you rarely need the top of the range lower sensitivity
phones do you?!
PrinceGaz.
From: "David W. Tamkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> S> [Niels's] problem is this:
> S> ______________ ______
> S> | MD |=====|Re= |======AirHead Amp (big, heavy)======Headphones
> S> | unit |~~~~~|mote|
> S> -------------- ------
>
> And the headphones can't be used without the amplifier? They sound totally
> unsuited and *unintended* for portable use in the first place. In that case
> the best plan seems to be to use headphones that don't require a large, heavy
> piece of additional equipment and leave the Airheads at home.
>
> As Dan [Scellen] explains, Niels wants to have this instead:
>
> ______________
> | MD |===================AirHead Amp (big, heavy)======Headphones
> | unit |~~~~~Remote
> --------------
>
> So what he wants to cut off isn't the remote's headphone jack but rather its
> 3.5mm *plug*. No wonder it didn't make sense. He wants to leave only the
> edge card connector on the remote so that it won't use or block the unit's
> 3.5mm output jack. But he'll still have the big, heavy amplifier to contend
> with. Where is that supposed to dangle while he's out?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
