===================================================
= NB: Over 50% of this message is QUOTED, please =
= be more selective when quoting text =
===================================================
I don't think this is entirely true. Screwing up a MD is virtually
impossible, while screwing up a CD-R is much easier. Meaning; you have to
be computer literate to be able to use a CD-RW, while MD only needs you to
know how to control eg a tape deck...
At 13:03 29-8-01 -0500, you wrote:
>IMHO burners are "what you ge is what you pay for" i personally will only
>use Plextor drives. Yeah i pay more, but ya know what, I have yet to have a
>problem with any of them. anyway just my 2 cents worth. anyway MD still
>rules in my collection.
>
>
> > I've had a lot of horrible problems with CD burners, the kind that make
>you
> > doubt computer technology as a whole. MD has been comparatively flawless:
> > slow, but rock-solid reliable. And its degradation is reliable: MD will
> > always degrade the sound extremely slightly, while MP3 so far has been
>very
> > unreliable, as normally used in practice. I could list problems I've had
>with
> > MP3 and MD, and MP3 has reliability problems, in my experience.
>
>
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
>"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To stop getting this list send a message containing just the word
"unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
