On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 01:43:30PM -0700, Valdemar Moreira Pavesi wrote: > Adam,Jonathan > > > ::findleaks -dv > findleaks: maximum buffers => 5538 > findleaks: actual buffers => 5167 > findleaks: > findleaks: potential pointers => 476621388 > findleaks: dismissals => 467057088 (97.9%) > findleaks: misses => 9348415 ( 1.9%) > findleaks: dups => 210725 ( 0.0%) > findleaks: follows => 5160 ( 0.0%) > findleaks: > findleaks: elapsed wall time => 32 seconds > findleaks: > BYTES LEAKED VMEM_SEG CALLER > 8192 7 fffffd7f937b7000 MMAP > 16384 1 fffffd7ffdf8d000 MMAP > 4096 1 fffffd7ffdee6000 MMAP > 4096 1 fffffd7ffdab8000 MMAP > 4096 1 fffffd7ffd1a9000 MMAP > 4096 1 fffffd7fa572e000 MMAP > 4096 1 fffffd7fa0ebe000 MMAP > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Total 7 oversized leaks, 45056 bytes > > CACHE LEAKED BUFCTL CALLER > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Total 0 buffers, 0 bytes > > mmap(2) leak: [fffffd7f937b7000, fffffd7f937b9000), 8192 bytes > mmap(2) leak: [fffffd7ffdf8d000, fffffd7ffdf91000), 16384 bytes > mmap(2) leak: [fffffd7ffdee6000, fffffd7ffdee7000), 4096 bytes > mmap(2) leak: [fffffd7ffdab8000, fffffd7ffdab9000), 4096 bytes > mmap(2) leak: [fffffd7ffd1a9000, fffffd7ffd1aa000), 4096 bytes > mmap(2) leak: [fffffd7fa572e000, fffffd7fa572f000), 4096 bytes > mmap(2) leak: [fffffd7fa0ebe000, fffffd7fa0ebf000), 4096 bytes > > > > > > Thanks! So much for your help , I really apreciate. > > > Every day we are finding a lot problems using MDB and DTRACE.
Great! I'm investigating to see if ::findleaks can deal better with partial cores. Cheers, - jonathan
