Jonathan Adams wrote: > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 08:36:43AM -0400, Richard Lowe wrote: >> "max at bruningsystems.com" <max at bruningsystems.com> writes: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> John Levon wrote: >>>> To my mind, maintaining some level of compatibility is useful in itself. >>>> mdb.eng's mdb wrapper notwithstanding, it can still be troublesome. >>>> >>>> >>> Great! When is mdb.eng going to be accessible on opensolaris? How >>> about mdb.eng's >>> mdb wrapper? >>> >> $SRC/cmd/mdb/tools/scripts, would seem to be the wrapper and >> associated, or, at least, a collection of things that behave very >> similarly to what is described. > > Indeed; this has unfortunately atrophied (and relies on being inside the > SWAN); > I'm looking in to reviving it, but I don't know how much will be available > for opensolaris.
It seems to me that if we made use of the onnv_XX tags that have been going into the Mercurial clone for a while, then it shouldn't be too hard to regenerate the per-build mdb dmods and usr/bin/$ISADIR/mdb command. James C. McPherson -- Senior Kernel Software Engineer, Solaris Sun Microsystems http://blogs.sun.com/jmcp http://www.jmcp.homeunix.com/blog
