I recommend getting the process documented in a service level agreement and get 
managers to sign off on it.  If the desktop staff are supposed to plug a 
“shelf” machine in once a month but aren’t it really should not be up to you to 
monitor and enforce that.  Document the process and get their manager to sign 
off on it.  If they deploy a “shelf” machine and it spends the first several 
hours getting caught up and the end-user is upset, it falls on the desktop’s 
manager to enforce policy.

You don’t really have a technical problem.  You are looking for a technical 
solution for a failure of staff to follow policy.

Unless you are their supervisor, it isn’t your job to follow the desktop folks 
around and make sure that they’re doing their jobs.  That is what their manager 
is paid to do.  I know I sounds cynical, but you have a personnel problem and 
not a technical problem.  Finding a technical solution is just making more work 
for you.

Mike
“The Jaded Cynic”
☺


From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Todd Miller 
<[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, April 8, 2016 at 5:41 PM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Hot/Warm spare computers?

Believe me, keeping them plugged in was my first suggestion, but we often don’t 
have the facilities available to do that.
Right now, they are required to plug a “shelf” machine into Ethernet and turn 
it on for at least one day per month – but my compliance rate on that rule 
sucks.  They almost never do it, and I don’t have the time or patients to ride 
them on it.  In reality – the process I am proposing is not all that different 
from OEM factory mode.

Of course I prune SCCM, but that takes 180 days of no talking.  AD, we don’t 
prune any more.  We have a provisioning process now and use stale AD membership 
as one of the hints a machine has gone missing or could be taken back for 
repurposing.

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Marcum, John
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 3:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Hot/Warm spare computers?

Ideally what Andreas says is the best solution.

For me they’d age out of both CM and AD. Are you not pruning either?






________________________________
        John Marcum
               MCITP, MCTS, MCSA
               Desktop Architect
   Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
________________________________
    [VP] <https://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/overview>
          [MS] <http://mmsmoa.com/>

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Andreas Hammarskjöld
Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 2:55 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [MDT-OSD] RE: Hot/Warm spare computers?

Keep them warm, i.e. plugged in with Ethernet and wake em up weekly to update 
them and let them slumber to sleep once patched and updated. Keep them in a 
collection and check them out when they leave. Simple. If you got “roles” you 
can have a few of each as well.

Don’t build and put on the shelf. That’s like cooking food and putting it on 
the shelf… thinking it’s going to be good when you want to eat it, then you 
might as well build from scratch and skip the whole thing. That will be equally 
fast.

//A

From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Miller, Todd
Sent: den 8 april 2016 21:33
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [MDT-OSD] Hot/Warm spare computers?

I am looking for some ideas about this scenario.

Our desktop support staff frequently installs computers using OSD/ MDT and then 
sit the computers on a shelf – sometimes for several months-- before putting 
them into service.  This is mostly because they want to be able to quickly drop 
a new computer in place if an existing computer fails.   If a computer in a 
critical area, they want to swap out the computer quickly so that critical use 
is not down for the day.

This cause me stress because those machines are in AD and in SCCM but are not 
active.  So they show up on my reports of machines that are AD joined but 
haven’t checked in in a while (are they lost or stolen or just sitting on a 
shelf?) They haven’t patched in a while (are they on a shelf or is SCCM agent 
broken?)  It is really difficult to tell the difference between a computer that 
is off and a computer that is broken.  At least the Off machines respond to a 
WOL typically.  Machines sitting on a shelf do not….

Id like to have a task sequence that prepares the computer with the OS and 
applications and brings it to current patch level, but then is able to put the 
computer into a “dormant mode.”   Dormant mode might mean deleting the computer 
from AD, preparing the computer to resume the TS on next power on, and then 
powering off.

Then when the computer turns on, the TS should resume. Maybe I’d have a task 
step to rejoin AD and go through some finalization process – maybe run an 
install update task to get caught back up etc and then the machine is ready  to 
go.  This would get the machines ready faster and would not cause me so much 
trouble with idle machines on shelves.

Is there a name for this already?  Good blogs about it?

________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and 
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you 
have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________

________________________________

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail is from a law firm and may be protected by 
the attorney-client or work product privileges. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail and then 
delete it from your computer.

________________________________
Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential and 
may be legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are 
hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of 
this communication is strictly prohibited.  Please reply to the sender that you 
have received the message in error, then delete it.  Thank you.
________________________________
**********************************************************
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be 
used for urgent or sensitive issues 

Reply via email to