Use the offline servicing ability described in one of those links to patch your 
wim

Sent from my phone, please excuse any typo's as a result.


> On 12 Aug 2016, at 22:25, Miller, Todd <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Niall, those links will come in handy, I’m sure.
>  
> I tried using the media creation tool to build an Update ISO to import into 
> the OS Upgrade Packages, but SCCM refuses it.  It looks like it might only 
> accept ISOs from the MVLS site  -  and not the ISO media creation tool, so I 
> will be stalled out waiting for the MVLS keeper to download the updating 
> enterprise ISO.
>  
>  
>  
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 
> On Behalf Of Niall Brady
> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2016 3:14 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [MDT-OSD] Testing upgrade to Windows 10 1607
>  
> hi Todd, in case you haven't seem them the following should help
>  
> How can I use the Upgrade Task Sequence in System Center Configuration 
> Manager (Current Branch) ?
> How can I use servicing plans in System Center Configuration Manager (Current 
> Branch) to upgrade Windows 10 devices ?
> A deeper look at the Upgrade task sequence in System Center Configuration 
> Manager (Current Branch)
>  
>  
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Miller, Todd <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have Windows 10 1511 Enterprise deployed to a couple of computers in my 
> environment.  I would like to test the two different methods of getting 
> Windows 10 feature updates out to clients to figure out how we are going to 
> handle updating Win 10 every few months.
>  
> For the servicing method, I am a little cautions because I just got servicing 
> created and now there are 16 different updates listed.  I am only interested 
> in one – “Upgrade to Windows 10 Enterprise version 1511, 10586 – en-us, 
> Volume”.  I don’t know how to remove all these other entries that I am not 
> interested in.  there are entries for the other editions and also the EN-GB 
> flavoured language (haha) as well as the “N” versions for most.   Before I 
> turn on servicing plans, I want to avoid downloading all those other 
> versions.  I saw something Kent posted on his blog that he has  a couple 
> hundred instances in there and they all started downloading (or would have).  
> I read a suggestion to go into WSUS and decline the update versions/editions 
> that I don’t need before setting up a servicing plan.  What about in a couple 
> of months when 1607 comes into WSUS?  I don’t want to have to constantly 
> remember to turn those off?  Do I need to have servicing enabled in order to 
> see the version information in the servicing dashboard?    I like the 
> dashboard, but I think I am unlikely to use servicing plans and will favor 
> Task Sequences.
>  
> For the Task Sequence method, I was looking at this blog entry… 
> https://osddeployment.wordpress.com/2016/08/05/how-to-upgrade-windows-10-1607-with-sccm-1606-inplace-task-sequence/
> And will try to implement it that way – looks straight forward.
>  
> I think I will need to use the TS method as there are compatibility checks 
> and offers to postpone required before I update a client system.   I at least 
> want to look at the servicing method though, so I am familiar with the road 
> not taken.
>  
> On a  side note - I think it is hilarious and frustrating how Microsoft only 
> made it to the second Windows 10 update before the marketing folks abandoned 
> the numbering/naming system.  This recent feature update is not being 
> marketed as Windows 10 v1607, but Windows 10 “Anniversary Update.”  Will all 
> the feature updates going forward be named or will we just have an 
> inconsistent devil may care attitude towards versioning the OS and what we 
> use to refer to these updates?  This really matters because now there is a 
> mix of terms used by software vendors and customers on the web announcing 
> compatibility and discussing issues.  It also screws up web searches when you 
> are looking for information…  What articles do I miss when searching for 1607 
> and the blog author uses the  term “Anniversary Update” instead and vis 
> versa?  
>  
> 
> Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is intended 
> only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and 
> may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from 
> disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
> the sender immediately and delete or destroy all copies of the original 
> message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from UI Health Care may be 
> retained as required by law or regulation. Thank you.
>  
> 
> 
> Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by the 
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is intended 
> only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and 
> may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from 
> disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any 
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly 
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify 
> the sender immediately and delete or destroy all copies of the original 
> message and attachments thereto. Email sent to or from UI Health Care may be 
> retained as required by law or regulation. Thank you.

Reply via email to