This is how we do ours too. I use this script to modify the .wim before
using it in the TS:

https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/systemcenter/Removing-Built-in-apps-65dc387b#content

Works just fine.

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Miller, Todd <todd-mil...@uiowa.edu> wrote:

> We are using a task sequence to feature upgrade clients from 1607 to 1703
> and would like to make sure extra consumer apps are not (re)installed
> during the feature update.
>
>
>
> There is this article from Michael that suggests it is fine to just DISM
> those components out of the install.wim that is used by the task sequence
> when performing the feature update.
>
> It says that the is it he best and most straight forward way to feature
> upgrade Windows 10 while avoiding those extra components.
>
>
>
> Is the guidance here no longer valid?  In our testing this method works
> great.  Removing the components after the upgrade leaves bits of cruft.
>
>
>
> https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/mniehaus/2016/
> 08/23/windows-10-1607-keeping-apps-from-coming-back-when-
> deploying-the-feature-update/
>
>
>
> I brought this up recently at MMS, and was told by people who’s opinions I
> respect that this was a really horrible idea because DISM would not remove
> the components cleanly.
>
>
>
> Discuss??
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Notice: This UI Health Care e-mail (including attachments) is covered by
> the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is
> intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
> addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential,
> and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the
> intended recipient, any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
> communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or
> destroy all copies of the original message and attachments thereto. Email
> sent to or from UI Health Care may be retained as required by law or
> regulation. Thank you.
> ------------------------------
>

Reply via email to