FCC Get’s Involved in War over White Space

By John Greaves
DigitalTrends.com

December 26, 2009

http://www.digitaltrends.com/features/120549/


The FCC is getting involved in the war over the wireless spectrum to 
make sure everyone get's enough bandwidth. But can they help?

Armed with a congressional mandate and stimulus funds, the FCC is 
working on a National Broadband Plan to ensure the digital media 
technology industry has sufficient broadband to spur economic growth. 
The FCC unveiled a sneak peek on Dec. 17 of what it will report to 
Congress by the Feb. 17, 2010, deadline. Applause was not deafening.

Although Mark Wigfield, the FCC spokesman for the National Broadband 
Plan says, “I think everybody thinks it’s a good idea to look at who’s 
not getting service and figure out ways to get it to them,” not 
everybody seems to agree on how to achieve this goal.

Wigfield says the issue is a critical one, because an explosion of 
mobile devices and apps for those devices is exponentially draining the 
available broadband spectrum. “The International Telecom Union said we 
need 760 – 840 MHz of broadband. Right now we have about 500MHz and 
we’ve got only about 50 MHz in the pipeline,” Wigfield says. Typically 
according to an FCC presentation it takes about six to 13 years to 
release more spectrum.

Tech expert Emily Nagle Green agrees. “Appetites for broadband in both 
wire line and wireless networks are booming. But that’s been the story 
since the very dawn of digital networks — demand cyclically threatens to 
swamp supply as we find new ideas for using the network,” says Green, 
who is author of ANYWHERE: How Global Connectivity is Revolutionizing 
the Way We Do Business and CEO of the tech research and consulting firm 
the Yankee Group.

The National Broadband Plan seeks to expand infrastructure through the 
Universal Service Fund, which subsidizes rural phone service and 
low-income consumers while looking for ways to maximize our current 
available spectrum. That means reallocation of unused spectrum and 
possible channel sharing among broadcasters. There is some agreement on 
government subsidy for infrastructure expansion but broadcasters are 
drawing a line in the sand over the last two items.

The National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) and the Association for 
Maximum Service Television (MSTV) say taking away spectrum to give to 
wireless ignores the public service aspects of broadcast. Quoted in 
Broadcast Engineering, the associations say, “core public interest 
goals, like providing local news, emergency information, universal 
service and educational programs, must be taken into account.”

Another issue is the hefty cost of the recent switch to digital 
programming. “Consumers have spent more than $25 billion in HDTV 
receivers and more than $2 billion dollars – subsidized by government 
coupons – on DTV converter boxes. Additionally, broadcasters have 
invested billions in converting their infrastructure to support DTV,” 
say the NAB and MSTV.

Nevertheless, Wigfield says the FCC isn’t taking away spectrum. “Nobody 
is talking about taking away spectrum from TV, we want to find out how 
they can be fairly compensated for spectrum they’re not using.”

Industry experts say statistics show that broadcast is no longer the 
major supplier of TV programming. “Only about 14 percent of households 
with TVs get TV from over-the-air broadcast,” says Rick Rotondo, chief 
marketing officer and co-founder of Spectrum Bridge, a company that 
seeks to make spectrum available and productive. “Even that 14 percent 
may be overstated, because if you take total houses with TV, subtract 
out those who get TV from cable and satellite, those who get it over the 
Internet and those who use their TVs only for DVDs and gaming you might 
get a lower number,” Rotondo adds. “Broadcasters have been fighting 
making white space available for years because they’re afraid of 
interference, now since the FCC is talking about taking it, thought 
leaders in the broadcast industry are saying let’s embrace it.”

White space can be an important rural solution for the shortfall in 
middle mile infrastructure. Rather than physical lines connecting local 
nodes, towers and Telco back offices to the big network, Rotondo says 
the city of Claudville, Va., used unlicensed white space to fill in the 
middle mile, which actually led to higher speeds than neighboring areas.

Unfortunately, unlicensed white space is more prevalent in rural areas 
than urban ones. So while white space can help solve the problem of 
adding access to places that do not currently have it, it doesn’t 
address the high urban demand for more spectrum. “If you look at urban 
areas there are more TV stations using more parts of the spectrum but 
also more mobile Internet usage such as iPhones,” Rotondo says.

To address this issue, the FCC is investigating the feasibility of 
increased channel sharing. However, entities such as Occam Networks, a 
rural broadband access provider, are concerned about the customer 
service implications of channel sharing. “The issue we see is, if we 
have one station and it’s corrupted, I know where to go for help,” says 
Russ Sharer, VP of marketing for Occam. “Sharing bears with it the 
burden of better digital tools to see who’s at fault when there is a 
problem.”

Industry players are wary of stifling private sector motivation to 
expand and improve. “In particular in the US due to the apparent causes 
of the economic crisis, we seem headed for more regulation than I 
personally think is healthy,” Green says.

Sharer agrees. “We need to design an economic model that makes the 
networks want to get involved. What happened with Verizon’s FiOS is a 
great example of how it could work,” Sharer says.

Rotondo also points out that wireless providers should be spectrum 
efficient. My iPhone automatically switches to Wi-Fi if I’m downloading 
something that’s bigger than 10MB,” he says. “I think Verizon is 
starting to realize the savings of using Wi-Fi where available instead 
of relying just on their broadband network.”

Everyone interviewed by DMB agrees it’s past time to address this issue. 
“At the highest level Occam believes we’ll all communicate in two ways, 
antenna and fiber. Anything that makes that antenna more effective and 
encourages deployment of more fiber is good,” Sharer says.

--------------
John Greaves is a freelance writer in the Atlanta, Ga. area. His work 
has appeared in newspapers and other online platforms.

-- 
================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204 
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
Mail: antunes at uh dot edu

***********************************
* POST TO [email protected] *
***********************************

Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to