January 25, 2010

Legal Sites Plan Revamps as Rivals Undercut Price
By ASHLEE VANCE
NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/25/technology/25westlaw.html?ref=business&pagewanted=print


Westlaw and LexisNexis, the dominant services in the market for 
computerized legal research, will undergo sweeping changes in a bid to 
make it easier and faster for lawyers to find the documents they need.

Lawyers and researchers paying to go online to find court cases and 
other legal documents should find better-looking interfaces, more 
relevant search results and new tools for document-sharing and other 
collaboration.

The changes to the research services are a reaction by Westlaw and 
LexisNexis to lower-priced — sometimes free — rivals and arrive at a 
time when law firms are working to cut overhead. The two companies also 
want to cater to a younger generation of lawyers accustomed to slick Web 
services and the search interfaces presented by companies like Google 
and Microsoft.

“I think Westlaw and Lexis have been balancing the needs of an 
older-generation of lawyers accustomed to using their services with 
bringing things up to the 21st century,” said Carolyn Elefant, a lawyer 
who practices in Washington and writes the MyShingle blog. “My guess is 
that they saw an opportunity to update their platforms with the legal 
industry in such a state of flux.”

Westlaw will introduce its changes on Feb. 1; LexisNexis has yet to 
specify a date.

Lawyers and other researchers turn to services like Westlaw and 
LexisNexis to find a wide variety of legal documents, public records and 
analysis. A single lawyer might pay about $100 a month for a limited 
version, while large law firms will pay millions of dollars for 
unlimited access. Westlaw and LexisNexis each bring in more than $1 
billion a year for their respective parent companies, Thomson Reuters 
and Reed Elsevier.

Both services were quick to embrace the digital age in the 1970s when 
they offered electronic versions of their systems. They were pioneers in 
the move to the Web during its infancy.

In the subsequent years, however, Westlaw and LexisNexis have started to 
look dated. Westlaw, for example, last did a major overhaul to the 
underlying technology behind its research system in 1998. Since then, 
the main Westlaw Web site has filled with dozens of links, covering 
legal databases, statutes, court rules, forms, investigation tools, news 
and analysis.

Mike Dahn, vice president for product development at WestlawNext, said 
it took the company five years to build the new system. The company 
interviewed lawyers and tracked the ways in which they used the service. 
It analyzed data on how lawyers did searches and even used eye-tracking 
systems to understand what parts of a Web site drew the lawyers’ attention.

Because of advances in computing power and computer science, lawyers can 
now search all the databases in a given jurisdiction, rather than having 
to hand-select the pools of information they believe might be relevant 
to a given case.

Most important, according to Mr. Dahn, the WestlawNext service has a 
revamped search system that allows lawyers to type in general requests, 
as they might on Google, rather than their typical narrow searches. The 
search system also relies on algorithms to find documents related to a 
case that the lawyers may not have thought they needed.

In a few weeks, LexisNexis will announce a revamped interface as well 
and show off a suite of collaboration tools that let lawyers share and 
work on documents together, said Michael Walsh, the head of United 
States legal markets for LexisNexis.

Mr. Walsh declined to discuss more specific details.

The executives from Westlaw and LexisNexis stressed that their broad 
access to legal documents, experience in this market and legal analysis 
provide advantages over cheaper competitors. Google, for example, has a 
free search service called Google Scholar that digs through cases and 
legal journals.

“You can get a pretty good percentage of the results you get out of 
Westlaw or Lexis by using the free tools,” said Don Cruse, a lawyer in 
Austin, Tex., who writes the Supreme Court of Texas blog.

-- 
================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
Mail: antunes at uh dot edu

***********************************
* POST TO [email protected] *
***********************************

Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to