FEBRUARY 3, 2010

Pushing to Bring TV to the Internet
Start-Up's Technology Can Transmit High-Quality Video, but It Must Convince 
Networks to Sign On

By ETHAN SMITH
Wall Street Journal

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704022804575041070405958514.html?mod=loomia&loomia_si=t0:a16:g12:r3:c0.190671:b30249554


A small start-up is trying to do what many in Hollywood and Silicon Valley 
have so far been unable to do: take Internet video from its YouTube origins 
to a full-fledged television service with dozens of channels.

"We have video on the Web," says Roxanne Austin, chief executive of Move 
Networks Inc. and a former president of DirecTV. "We don't have television 
on the Web."

Ms. Austin's 100-person company, which is based in American Fork, Utah, has 
raised more than $67 million from some prominent backers that include 
Microsoft Corp., Comcast Corp. and Walt Disney Co.'s venture-capital arm. 
But like past efforts by larger companies, including Microsoft and Motorola 
Inc., to offer Internet-delivered television, it faces obstacles, not least 
of which is getting content owners to sign on.

"The technology is good enough this can happen," says Boyd Peterson, an 
analyst at Grail Research. "Now it comes down to the business case."

Move's technology can transmit broadcast-quality video via the Web, in 
Internet protocol data packets. Depending on the available bandwidth, a 
capability called "adaptive streaming" can adjust the quality of the image 
(and thus the quantity of data), all the way up to high definition, the 
company says.

Move recently laid off about 15 employees amid its transition to its new 
Internet-TV offering, away from its earlier main business of providing 
video-streaming technology for the Web sites of broadcasters.

If the company is able to launch the service it is now pitching to 
broadcasters—tentatively dubbed Move TV—viewers could watch programs in one 
of three ways: via a computer's Web browser; on a television that is either 
equipped with a built-in Internet jack or connected to a set-top converter 
box; or on a wireless, Internet-connected device like an iPhone or iPad.

Because Move isn't laying cable or launching satellites, the company's 
executives argue they can charge consumers far less than traditional 
pay-television operators for a comparable suite of channels. Move hopes to 
undercut those operators further by offering a pared-down lineup—perhaps as 
few as 80 to 100 channels.

The company is pursuing deals to act as a back-end provider for 
Internet-service providers that want to add TV programming to their 
broadband offerings, and is also considering offering its service directly 
to consumers.

Move does have one customer lined up: CWI, the international division of 
Britain's Cable & Wireless PLC, which aims to offer the TV service to its 
204,000 Internet customers in 38, small, mostly Caribbean nations. The 
companies aim to launch the service this summer but are still in 
content-licensing talks.

Move executives say they have opened discussions with major U.S. 
broadcasters about licensing content and hope to have deals in place by the 
end of this year.

Mr. Peterson, the analyst, says it could be difficult for Move to sign up 
enough content creators, particularly small cable channels, who risk 
alienating the cable and satellite operators they depend on. "You're 
starting to see the tensions," he adds.

Move executives say they may be able to promise content owners as much 
money, or perhaps even more, per user, per channel, than existing 
competitors. But the total amount of money delivered every month is likely 
to be far lower than what cable and satellite operators pay.

The start-up's affiliations with both a content-creating behemoth (Disney) 
and a distribution giant (Comcast) could help. But even Disney isn't ready 
to commit. Asked about discussions with Move, a Disney spokesman said: "We 
always look at new technologies that offer consumers more choice, and that 
use business models which work for us financially."

Comcast last month launched a service called TV Everywhere that uses Move 
software to offer cable subscribers free on-demand access, via a Web site, 
to some TV programming. The service in some ways represents a pre-emptive 
strike against technologies like Move TV, and it isn't clear what the 
implications of TV Everywhere may be for Move's own subscription platform. 
Comcast declined to comment.

Move's proposed service would allow broadcasters to maintain some degree of 
what they call "linearity" in their programming—presenting their shows in a 
context that encourages viewers to tune in to more shows, rather than as 
the free-floating episodes found on services like Hulu and YouTube.

But if Move's business model were to succeed, it could turn cable providers 
into little more than utilities, maintaining thousands of miles of dumb 
pipe—pipe through which Move's snazzily repackaged TV programming would be 
flowing.

Media companies ranging from the New York Times Co. to the backers of Hulu 
have begun to look for online-business models that are more lucrative than 
their longstanding strategies of giving away their content online—often the 
same content that users must pay for when delivered by traditional channels 
like print and cable television.

"How do we create a subscription model [for television] on the Net that 
consumers would pay for?" asks Ms. Austin.

One of Move's tactics is to offer programming in new ways. For instance, in 
a demonstration of the company's proposed service, programming information 
is displayed in the same kind of grid that is standard on many cable 
systems—with a twist. A viewer can scroll backward in time and select 
programs from the past, as if they'd been stored on a digital video recorder.


=================================================
George Antunes                    Voice (713) 743-3923
Associate Professor               Fax   (713) 743-3927
Political Science                    Internet: antunes at uh dot edu
University of Houston
Houston, TX 77204-3011         

***********************************
* POST TO [email protected] *
***********************************

Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to