http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100312/ap_on_hi_te/af_tec_internet_pornogra
phy

By TOM MALITI, Associated Press Writer Tom Maliti, Associated Press
Writer - Fri Mar 12, 12:47 pm ET
NAIROBI, Kenya - Adult Web sites can't park themselves at a ".xxx"
address quite yet.

A global Internet oversight agency on Friday deferred a decision until
June on whether to create a ".xxx" Internet suffix as an online
red-light district.

The board of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or
ICANN, initiated a 70-day process of consultations on a domain that
could help parents block access to Adult sites. Use of the ".xxx" suffix
would be voluntary, though, and would not keep such content entirely
away from minors.

Backers of ".xxx" have billed the proposal as a way for the
adult-entertainment industry to clean up its act, though some Adult
sites worry that governments would wind up mandating its use, and
religious groups are concerned it would legitimize Adult sites.

Skeptics also note that Adult sites would likely keep their existing
".com" storefronts, even as they set up shop in the new ".xxx" domain
name, thereby giving people even more ways to find Adult sites online.

ICM Registry LLC first proposed the ".xxx" domain in 2000, and ICANN has
rejected it three times already since then. But an outside panel last
month questioned the board's latest rejection in 2007, prompting the
board to reopen the bid.

"There's a lot of complex issues," ICANN CEO Rod Beckstrom said, without
elaborating.

As it concluded weeklong meetings Friday in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi,
ICANN's board gave its chief executive and its chief lawyer two weeks to
recommend options for the agency to proceed. Once the ICANN board
receives the options from them, it will open them to public comment for
45 days and then make a decision at its June meeting in Brussels.

Stuart Lawley, ICM's chief executive, said he is looking forward to
seeing proposals in the next 14 days.

_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to