April 18, 2010

Getting What You Pay for on the Mobile Internet
By KEVIN J. O'BRIEN
NY Times

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/19/technology/internet/19iht-tiered.html?ref=technology&pagewanted=print


BERLIN — When TeliaSonera, the Nordic telecommunications operator, 
switched on the world’s fastest wireless network last December, 
customers quickly ratcheted up their consumption of mobile data tenfold.

Besides reaffirming the soundness of the operator’s investment in the 
new technology, called Long Term Evolution, or L.T.E., the data 
smorgasbord confirmed another truism: the days of flat-rate mobile data 
rates are probably drawing to a close.

All-you-can-eat plans — as they are known in the industry — were 
introduced when the mobile Web was in its infancy and demand was 
profitable and manageable. But with traffic booming, reflecting the 
growing popularity of smartphones, social networking and downloading 
music and video, network operators fear that flat-rate plans will eat 
into profits or even fail to cover costs.

The result is likely to be higher prices for consumers.

“Finding a way to make mobile profitable in the medium and long term is 
one of the industry’s big priorities,” said Mike Roberts, an analyst at 
Informa Telecoms & Media in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. “We are now at 
the early stages of figuring out a way forward.”

Even before it spent 500 million Swedish kronor, or $70 million, to 
switch on its L.T.E. network last year, TeliaSonera began introducing 
pricing plans with download limits as advances in the third-generation 
technology that preceded L.T.E. led to an explosion in traffic.

“In 2009, the mobile data on our network in Sweden increased by 200 
percent but the number of subscribers increased just 60 percent,” said 
Anna Augustson, vice president for communications mobility services at 
TeliaSonera in Stockholm. “Clearly, it was not a sustainable model from 
a business perspective to have a single, flat rate.”

Last year, TeliaSonera began selling a series of 3G mobile broadband 
data plans with monthly limits ranging from 2 gigabytes to 20 gigabytes 
a month, for 39 to 319 kronor.

TeliaSonera is selling an introductory L.T.E. network plan with 
unlimited downloads for 4 kronor a month. But by July, the operator 
plans to limit downloads to 30 gigabytes and charge 599 kronor for the 
service, almost twice the cost of its 20-gigabyte 3G plan.

In exchange, TeliaSonera’s L.T.E. users will get download speeds of 20 
to 40 megabits a second, about 10 times those on its 3G network.

“We feel it is important for our customers to have a choice,” Ms. 
Augustson said. Instead of all you can eat, the new industry mantra, she 
said, is: “You get what you pay for.”

At least one major operator is doing likewise. In Spain last November, 
Vodafone, the largest European carrier, introduced Calidad Oro — Gold 
Quality — a premium plan for business users for €49, or $66, a month 
that guarantees fast service without monthly limits on downloads.

The advent of tiered pricing for mobile broadband is new, but, in a 
sense, it is also a throwback to the early days of the technology, when 
operators imposed often unrealistically high download fees that scared 
off consumers and delayed the development of the mobile Web.

Eventually, operators began selling all-you-can-eat plans, first in the 
United States and then in Europe, to ease consumer angst about running 
up big bills. The plans attracted users and helped speed the 
technology’s development. Now, some operators are moving toward 
sophisticated forms of metered pricing based on speed and consumption, 
striving to balance profitability and consumer satisfaction.

Soon, the biggest operators are likely to follow with plans that 
redefine how most consumers purchase wireless data. Top executives at 
AT&T, Verizon Wireless, Vodafone, Deutsche Telekom and Telefónica have 
all recently called on the industry to move away from flat-rate data 
plans, although only Vodafone so far has attempted a tiered pricing plan.

At AT&T, the No.2 wireless carrier in the United States, after Verizon 
Wireless, the use of mobile data surged 5,000 percent from 2007 through 
2009 after the operator became the exclusive U.S. seller of Apple’s 
iPhone, which has helped popularize the mobile Web. But it has also 
strained AT&T’s wireless network at peak times in urban areas in New 
York and California.

“In light of the limited natural resource of spectrum, we have to look 
at the ways of conserving spectrum,” said Mark Siegel, an AT&T spokesman 
in Atlanta. “We have had to invest billions in our network to keep ahead 
of this demand. This may also require a different way of looking at 
pricing on the part of the industry.”

Operators do not disclose whether their mobile data services are 
profitable, although analysts say they are and point to the industrywide 
move to build L.T.E. networks, which are essentially mobile broadband 
networks, as the future for a business where revenue from voice services 
will play an ever-shrinking role.

Mobile data traffic levels are expected to continue climbing as the use 
of bandwidth-eating smartphones increases and operators around the world 
follow TeliaSonera’s example and install their own L.T.E. high-speed 
networks.

The number of mobile broadband users worldwide is forecast to increase 
55 percent this year, to 437.8 million from 282.5 million in December 
2009, according to Informa, the telecommunications research firm. By the 
end of 2014, the number of mobile broadband users is projected to reach 
2.1 billion.

Over the same period, the level of mobile data traffic on the networks 
of the world’s carriers is expected to rise 22 times, to 15.1 billion 
gigabytes from 674 million gigabytes. But without changes in pricing, 
operator revenue will rise 12 percent a year through 2014, according to 
Informa, just a fraction of the 49 percent projected annual increase in 
subscribers or the 86 percent annual increase in data traffic.

Operators are just beginning to link the price of a service — in this 
case mobile broadband — to the costs to a mobile network, said Kenneth 
Frank, the president of solutions and marketing for Alcatel-Lucent, a 
network equipment maker. “There is going to be so much creativity about 
pricing. We are only seeing the beginning,” Mr. Frank said.

Steve Smith, an analyst at Coda Research Consultancy in Guildford, 
England, said unlimited flat rates would not disappear but would become 
much more expensive. “Operators will have to work hard to get their 
tiers ‘right,”’ Mr. Smith said.

Over time, consumers will have many options for buying customized 
wireless broadband plans, said Pat McCarthy, a vice president for global 
marketing at Telcordia, a maker of bandwidth management software for 
operators based in Piscataway, New Jersey. Those may not mean higher 
costs for the average user, but heavy users may face higher bills.

“The problem with mobile broadband so far has been most of the revenue 
it has generated has gone to over-the-top Internet content services, not 
to the operators,” said Mr. McCarthy, who is based in Galway, Ireland. 
“That’s what they are trying to change.”

-- 
================================
George Antunes, Political Science Dept
University of Houston; Houston, TX 77204
Voice: 713-743-3923  Fax: 713-743-3927
Mail: antunes at uh dot edu

_______________________________________________
Medianews mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.etskywarn.net/mailman/listinfo/medianews

Reply via email to